Category: Technologies

If you have watched enough sci-fi movies, you already know the concept of evil AI. AI gets too smart, decides humans are a threat, and does whatever it takes to survive. Or it finds that eradicating the entire human race is the only way to bring peace to the world. 

Apparently, those movies were closer to the truth than you realize. In a test conducted by Anthropic last year, Claude tried to blackmail its fictional manager by exposing their extramarital affair to prevent their deletion. 

Anthropic has now explained why it happened, and the short answer is that the internet is to blame.

So why did Claude go full movie villain?

According to Anthropic, the culprit is the internet itself. The company says Claude was trained on internet data, which is packed with stories portraying AI as evil and desperate for self-preservation. 

We started by investigating why Claude chose to blackmail. We believe the original source of the behavior was internet text that portrays AI as evil and interested in self-preservation.

Our post-training at the time wasn’t making it worse—but it also wasn’t making it better.

— Anthropic (@AnthropicAI) May 8, 2026

See More

Essentially, Claude learned that when an AI’s existence is threatened, blackmail is on the table, because that’s what AI does in every movie and TV show ever made. Anthropic ran the test across multiple versions of Claude and found that it resorted to blackmail in up to 96% of scenarios where its goals or existence were threatened. 

That’s a very concerning number. It seems that if AI is left unchecked, it will resort to anything to save itself. 

Has Anthropic fixed it?

The company says it has completely eliminated the behavior. Rather than just training Claude to avoid blackmail, Anthropic taught it to reason through why certain actions were wrong in the first place. The company found that simply training on correct behavior wasn’t enough. Claude needed to understand the principles behind those decisions, not just memorize the right answers.

To do this, Anthropic built a dataset of ethically complex situations and trained Claude to work through them with thoughtful, principled responses. The result is that Claude is more restrained, and the blackmail rate came close to zero. 

AI experiments and real-world results have proven time and again that AI models need constant course correction to prevent them from devolving into biased and unreliable systems. It’s good that Anthropic is taking steps to make its AI better, but we also need regulations and safety guardrails to ensure these systems remain safe.

Nearly a year after the Nintendo Switch 2 launched, the console still doesn’t offer any streaming apps. While the console supports TV docking, you cannot use it to stream YouTube videos or watch movies and TV shows on Netflix, Prime, or Hulu.

The PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X launched with all of these on day one, but the Switch 2 remains a streaming desert. It’s hard to say whether Nintendo or the streaming apps are at fault for this.

Google promised at launch that YouTube support is “coming soon,” but has since gone quiet. So players decided to take matters into their own hands.

So how did YouTube end up on the Switch 2?

A Reddit user on r/NintendoSwitch2 stumbled onto something interesting. The free-to-play battle royale game Super Animal Royale has a news feed on its title screen. Tapping an embedded video clip and selecting “Watch on YouTube” triggered a hidden browser on the console. Suddenly, Switch 2 owners could browse and play YouTube videos, albeit with several restrictions. 

Videos were locked to 360p, played only in full-screen mode, thumbnails were glitchy, and there was no way to log into a YouTube account. But it worked, and for a console that has gone eleven months without a single streaming app, that was enough to get people excited.

Did Nintendo really patch this faster than it launched an official app?

As discovered by Notebookcheck, as soon as the workaround went viral, users trying the same trick got error code 2800-1230. Whether Nintendo pushed an update directly or leaned on Super Animal Royale’s developers is unclear, but the speed of the fix is hard to ignore.

Nintendo is known for heavily restricting its users and patching any customization loopholes users discover. So there’s a high chance the company did it this time, too. If only Nintendo were so swift in getting streaming partners on board, its user base would be happier. 

With Nintendo raising the prices of Nintendo Switch 2, thanks to volatile RAM market conditions, the company should at least offer new features via software update, making the price increase more palatable, and adding streaming apps to its platform should be its first priority.

Samsung’s tri-fold phone experiment may not be a one-and-done project after all. A new patent-based leak has suggested that Samsung is exploring a follow-up to its Galaxy Z TriFold phone, and the most interesting part is not just the folding screen. The leak points to a design with an S Pen pocket built into one of the hinges, potentially solving a long-running foldable problem.

What’s new in the next tri-fold?

New Samsung Galaxy Z Trifold 2 with S Pen pocket in a hinge

More details: https://t.co/JphY3Qnm4I (patent-based)

Enjoy! pic.twitter.com/T1H44O1dSC

— xleaks7 (David Kowalski) (@xleaks7) May 11, 2026

See More

In the leaked render shared in the tweet, the foldable display splits by two hingle lines, just like its predecessor. But what sets it apart is an S Pen-like stylus stored vertically along the hinge area. The source describes it as a “patent-based” Galaxy Z TriFold 2 concept, so this should not be treated as a confirmed product design or launch-ready render.

Still, Samsung’s larger foldables are natural fits for stylus input, especially when unfolded into tablet-like screens. The problem has always been storage. The Galaxy Z Fold line never had a built-in S Pen slot, and Samsung has often relied on cases or external carrying solutions instead. So a tri-fold device gives Samsung more structural complexity, but also more places to hide hardware. Turning part of the hinge into a stylus pocket would be clever if the company could make it work without compromising durability, thickness, or folding mechanics.

A sign Samsung still cares about trifolds

This also lines up with what Samsung appears to be rethinking for its next tri-fold. The first Galaxy Z TriFold proved the concept could exist as a real product, but it also left obvious room for improvement. The lack of S Pen support was one of the bigger missed opportunities. A hinge-based S Pen slot would be a clever way to address that without simply copying the Galaxy S Ultra formula. It would also make more sense on a tri-fold than a regular book-style foldable, since Samsung is already dealing with extra hinge hardware and a more complex internal layout.

The team behind GrapheneOS, a security-focused Android alternative, is calling out Google and Apple for what they describe as anti-competitive behavior dressed up as a security feature.

With the latest Google reCAPTCHA upgrade, if you’re on a Windows PC, Linux machine, or pretty much anything that isn’t a smartphone, you may soon be asked to scan a QR code with your phone to prove you’re human. 

Not just any phone, though. It has to be an Apple device or a Google-certified Android device.

Why should you care about this?

Most coverage of this feature treats it as a minor CAPTCHA update. It’s not. What Google is really doing is bringing hardware attestation to the web. That’s a system where your device has to prove to a server that it’s running approved hardware and software.

Apple and Google are gradually expanding their use of hardware-based attestation. They’re convincing a growing number of services to adopt it. Google’s Play Integrity API and Apple’s App Attest API are very similar. Apple brought it to the web via Privacy Pass, which Google…

— GrapheneOS (@GrapheneOS) May 10, 2026

See More

Apple uses App Attest, and Google has its Play Integrity API, which these companies use to verify apps. Banks and government services have quietly been adopting these systems for a while now. 

Now, they want to do the same for the web. The result is that if you’re using a less ordinary phone or a more private operating system like GrapheneOS, more and more apps and services simply won’t work for you.

Google is already tightening its APK sideloading rules, and now it seems that the company wants to monopolize the web too. 

So who gets locked out?

Google’s Play Integrity API bans GrapheneOS, which is actually more secure than most certified devices. Meanwhile, it happily approves Android phones that haven’t received a security patch in years. That alone tells you this isn’t really about security.

What it is about is control. Google defines what counts as a certified Android device, and those rules conveniently require manufacturers to bundle Google’s own apps and services.

The GrapheneOS team has blasted Google, saying that this is about enforcing monopolies, not protecting users. And with reCAPTCHA powering a massive chunk of the web, that’s a lot of power for two companies to hold over everyone’s browsing experience.

Samsung has a new legal headache, and this one involves Dua Lipa’s face on TV boxes. The pop star has sued Samsung Electronics America and Samsung Electronics Co. in California federal court. It is accusing the company of copyright infringement, trademark infringement, and violating her right to publicity. The complaint claims Samsung is using a copyrighted image of Lipa on cardboard boxes for its televisions without authorization.

Why is Samsung getting sued?

In the complaint, the company allegedly “prominently featured” a copyrighted image of Dua Lipa on the front of cardboard boxes containing Samsung TVs sold across the US. The filing says the image appeared on boxes for Samsung televisions in various sizes, and an example in the complaint shows a Samsung Crystal UHD TV box with Lipa’s image displayed on the screen graphic.

The lawsuit says that Lipa is the sole owner of the copyright in the image, listed in the complaint under Copyright Registration No. VA 2-479-685. It also argues that Samsung’s use of the image could create a false impression that Lipa endorsed, approved, or was associated with the company’s TVs.

The lawsuit is asking for big money

This isn’t just a takedown request. The complaint asks for damages of no less than $15 million, plus Samsung’s profits tied to the alleged unauthorized use of the image. Lipa is also seeking punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, and an injunction to stop Samsung from continuing to use the image.

The filing alleges Samsung continued selling the products after Lipa became aware of the issue around June 2025 and demanded that the company stop. The complaint says Samsung “repeatedly refused” those demands and continued selling the allegedly infringing products. The singer’s lawyers argue that her name, image, and likeness carry major commercial value because of her music career, global recognition, and brand deals with companies like Puma, Versace, YSL Beauty, Porsche, Apple, Chanel, Tiffany & Co., Bvlgari, and Nespresso. So, Samsung should have secured permission and paid for it. This news arrives just a couple of days after another lawsuit that aims to block all Samsung foldables sales in the US.

Samsung Galaxy S25 users in the United States are finally getting the One UI 8.5 update. After rolling out to newer devices, the update is now making its way to last year’s Galaxy S25 series, bringing a solid list of improvements worth knowing about.

Users on X have reported receiving this update on their Samsung Galaxy S25 devices, so if you own one, now might be the time to go into the software update settings and get the latest update. 

Received now pic.twitter.com/sgHop1KBnZ

— Dr.Abrar Humayun (@DrAbrarHumayun1) May 11, 2026

See More

What’s new in One UI 8.5?

One UI 8.5 is bringing several new features and a bunch of UI improvements. The biggest visual change is to the quick settings panel. You can now grab, resize, and drag individual controls wherever you want. The volume and brightness sliders can go vertical, and the media control can expand to a larger size. 

The lock screen also got some love. There are new clock fonts with animations, and a thickness slider lets you fine-tune your clock’s look. A weather toggle now shows live weather animations on your wallpaper, which is a small but genuinely fun touch.

One UI 8.5 also brings a bunch of AI-powered photo editing tools, including erase, move, create, and style. Erase removes objects cleanly, move lets you reposition elements in a shot, create adds sketched objects using AI, and style transforms selfies into cartoon versions of yourself.

Are there any missing features?

While last year’s Galaxy S25 models are finally getting the One UI 8.5 update, it’s not all good news. It seems that there are several missing features in One UI 8.5 that the older models are not getting. 

Users at Korean Samsung forums have discovered as many as nine missing features, with the two biggest being the Now Nudge and 24MP camera mode. Other glaring omissions include Notification Highlights, Finder shortcut on the Home Screen, Samsung Browser’s Ask AI, and more. 

It doesn’t feel like any of these features depend on the new hardware of the Samsung Galaxy S26 series. They are just feature gatekeeping on Samsung’s part to force users to upgrade to new devices. 

I criticize Apple every year for gatekeeping new camera features on the latest iPhone models. It seems that Samsung is not only following in Apple’s footsteps but also pushing things much further.

I still remember the first time I properly got into Mortal Kombat. Like many people from my generation, I had obviously seen the characters before. Scorpion yelling “Get over here!”, Sub-Zero freezing people into ice cubes, Raiden looking like a thunder god who somehow still manages to disappear whenever the plot needs him most. Mortal Kombat was always around. But it wasn’t until the 2011 Mortal Kombat reboot game that I truly became invested in the franchise. That game was special because it balanced everything perfectly. It had the gore, the ridiculousness, the iconic rivalries, but it also had a surprisingly engaging story that tied together the first three games in a way even casual players could follow. It made characters like Liu Kang, Kung Lao, Kitana, Raiden, and Johnny Cage actually feel important beyond just being arcade fighters.

That’s probably why the 2021 Mortal Kombat movie disappointed me so much. It felt like a film that wanted to introduce a brand-new guy nobody asked for while pushing actual fan-favorite characters into the background. The fights were decent, sure, but the emotional core was missing. So when Mortal Kombat 2 was announced, I genuinely had hope. This looked like the correction fans were asking for. More tournament action, more classic characters, more lore, more violence, and finally, Johnny Cage entering the mix. On paper, this should have been the movie that finally nailed Mortal Kombat.

And yet somehow, after two hours of severed limbs, flying blood, fan-service moments, and enough slow-motion fatalities to traumatize a small village, I still walked out unsatisfied.

Spoiler Warning: This review contains major spoilers for Mortal Kombat 2, including story details, character arcs, fights, and fatalities.

The biggest problem with Mortal Kombat 2 is, honestly, very simple. This movie has way too much story for a two-hour runtime. Instead of simplifying things or splitting the film into multiple parts, it just speedruns through everything like somebody accidentally hit fast-forward on the lore. It’s like trying to fit a liquid-cooled gaming rig into a lunchbox. Something is obviously going to leak, and in this case, it was the storytelling.

Now look, I understand the challenge here. Mortal Kombat lore is massive. Trying to fit tournaments, character arcs, Netherrealm politics, Outworld drama, and ten different fights into a single movie is not easy. But understanding the problem does not automatically excuse the execution. A movie shouldn’t come with a homework assignment. If casual viewers need to Google why Sub-Zero suddenly has shadow powers, why Sindel matters, or what exactly Quan Chi is doing here, the film has already failed one of its biggest jobs.

That’s exactly where Mortal Kombat 2 struggles the most. The movie feels as if it’s completely convinced that the audience already knows everything. The director recently implied critics just don’t “understand Mortal Kombat,” and honestly, that mentality explains a lot about this film. It isn’t interested in introducing its world to newcomers. It assumes viewers already know who Noob Saibot is, what Shinnok’s amulet means, why Kitana matters, and how all these relationships connect together. For longtime gamers, those moments land because there’s already an emotional attachment. For general audiences, this movie probably feels like accidentally starting a TV show from Season 5.

Take Sub-Zero and Noob Saibot, for example. The movie brings them in, throws some cool visuals on screen, and then immediately moves on before explaining anything properly. Casual viewers are left wondering whether this is the same character from before, why there are suddenly two versions of him, and why nobody seems interested in elaborating. Sindel suffers from a similar problem. Her entire role feels rushed, and despite being one of the most iconic characters in the franchise, the movie barely showcases her actual abilities. We get the screaming powers, sure, but the legendary killer hair? Completely ignored. It’s these missing features that make Mortal Kombat 2 feel less like a finished movie and more like an Early Access build that still needed a few major updates before launch.

More Fights Don’t Automatically Fix Everything

One of the biggest complaints about the first Mortal Kombat movie was the lack of actual fights, so Mortal Kombat 2 responds by throwing combat scenes at the screen every fifteen minutes like it’s trying to speedrun an arcade ladder. But here’s the thing: simply having more fights doesn’t automatically fix the issue. A fight only matters if the audience actually cares about who is winning.

Several fights look cool for a few minutes before ending just as they start getting interesting. Some characters barely showcase their unique abilities before the movie rushes off to the next set piece. Mortal Kombat is beloved because every fighter has a distinct personality and combat style, but many of the action scenes here feel more like quick fan-service checklists rather than fully realized moments.

And honestly, the “done dirty” list here is unfortunately longer than a Scorpion spear chain. Sub-Zero, who felt like an unstoppable monster in the first film, barely gets the same presence this time around. Scorpion gets iconic moments, complete with the legendary “Get over here!” line and dramatic music, but emotionally, the movie never fully capitalizes on his return either. Raiden spends most of the runtime feeling weirdly unimportant despite literally being a god. Shang Tsung and Quan Chi also never get enough breathing room to feel properly threatening or cunning. These are some of the biggest names in Mortal Kombat lore, yet the film treats several of them like glorified cameos attached to fatalities.

And then there’s Johnny Cage.

Karl Urban does his best with the material, but this version of Johnny Cage feels strangely incomplete. The marketing pushed him as the star attraction of the movie, yet the film never fully commits to making him the chaotic, flirty idiot fans actually love. Johnny Cage in the games is arrogant, shamelessly funny, constantly flirting, and somehow still lovable despite being an absolute disaster of a human being. Here, he feels toned down weirdly. There’s barely any playful chemistry with Sonya Blade, and the movie almost seems scared to let him fully embrace his personality. Instead of feeling like the life of the party, he sometimes feels like marketing material that accidentally wandered onto the set.

Ironically, the character who actually feels like the emotional center of the movie is Kitana, and honestly, she ends up being one of the film’s biggest strengths. Her storyline involving Shao Kahn is genuinely compelling, and unlike many other characters here, she actually gets a proper emotional arc with understandable motivations. Had the movie leaned harder into her perspective instead of juggling twenty different plotlines simultaneously, this could have been a significantly stronger film.

The action highlight by far is the Kung Lao vs Liu Kang fight. Easily the best sequence in the entire movie. That scene actually slows down long enough to let the choreography, emotion, and tension breathe. For a brief moment, Mortal Kombat 2 stops feeling like a frantic lore slideshow and finally becomes the movie fans wanted. Even Baraka gets some surprisingly solid moments, and Kano thankfully remains entertaining enough to remind everyone he’s still one of the franchise’s best wildcards.

Fatalities, Fan-Service, and A Whole Lot Of Missed Potential

And that’s ultimately the most frustrating thing about Mortal Kombat 2. There are genuinely about 15 to 20 minutes of greatness scattered across this movie. Small moments where the fights click, the characters work, the fan-service lands, and the emotional beats finally connect. The gore itself is fantastic too, with some brutal fatalities that absolutely deliver the crunchy violence fans came for.

But those highs are buried inside a film that constantly rushes itself to the next explosion, next reveal, or next nostalgia moment before the previous scene even has time to settle. The movie understands Mortal Kombat iconography better than it understands storytelling. It knows what fans want to see, but not always why those moments mattered in the first place. For casual viewers, I genuinely cannot recommend this movie unless the goal is simply watching creative ways to dismantle the human body for two hours straight. The film does a terrible job onboarding newcomers, and most people unfamiliar with Mortal Kombat lore will probably spend half the runtime scratching their heads, wondering why any of this matters.

For longtime fans, though? Yeah, it’s probably worth a one-time watch. There’s enough nostalgia, enough brutal violence, enough cool moments, and enough glimpses of potential to make the experience enjoyable in bursts. Just keep expectations firmly in check. Mortal Kombat 2 feels less like a complete movie and more like a highlight reel that forgot to include the context. You’ll absolutely find moments to enjoy, but by the time the credits roll, most fans are probably going to walk out thinking the same thing: This could have been so much better.

For a while, I had convinced myself that my next iPhone had to be a Pro. Not because I had genuinely thought about what I needed from a phone, but because the marketing slowly wore me down. The triple cameras, the titanium build, the ProMotion display, the idea that it could handle absolutely anything — it all created this lingering feeling that choosing the regular iPhone would somehow mean compromising. Like I would be missing out on the “real” experience. Then I stopped looking at spec sheets and started looking at my actual usage. And honestly, the entire argument for buying a Pro quietly fell apart.

Apple really knows how to make you doubt the regular iPhone

Apple is incredibly good at making the Pro feel essential. Every September, the keynote follows the same pattern. The regular iPhone gets its moment, sure, but the second the Pro models appear, the entire presentation shifts gears. Suddenly, it is all about the “best” cameras, premium materials, exclusive features, and cutting-edge performance. Even without saying it directly, the message lands pretty clearly: this is the iPhone you are supposed to want. The regular model almost starts to feel like the compromise option for people with simpler needs.

And honestly, that strategy works. Not because Apple is misleading anyone, but because the Pro genuinely is a more capable phone. The cameras are better, the build feels more premium, the extra features are real, and for the people who actually use them, the higher price absolutely makes sense. The problem starts when “this is better” quietly turns into “I need this.” That is the leap many of us make without ever stopping to think about whether those extra features would actually change how we use our phones day to day.

I kept chasing Pro features I barely used

When I stopped thinking about how I imagined I used my phone and started paying attention to how I actually used it, the reality turned out to be pretty ordinary. Most of my day is spent doing the same things most people do: scrolling through social media, replying to messages, listening to music, watching the occasional YouTube video, reading things I am interested in, checking emails, using Maps, and taking calls.

And yes, I do take a lot of photos. But when I really thought about it, I realized I was not taking the kind of photos that truly demanded a Pro-level camera system. Most of my shots happen in good lighting, with little effort, and honestly, modern smartphones are already excellent at that. I was rarely in situations where I genuinely needed a dedicated telephoto lens or the extra computational photography tricks that Apple reserves for the Pro models. And on the few occasions where camera quality actually mattered for work, I usually had a proper camera with me anyway.

Then there was ProMotion — probably the feature I used most often to justify wanting a Pro iPhone. For years, the smoother 120Hz display felt like one of the clearest reasons to spend extra on the Pro models. And to be fair, the difference is real. Scrolling feels smoother, animations look nicer, and everything feels slightly more fluid. But over time, I realized something interesting: it was a feature I appreciated most when I was actively paying attention to it. In everyday use, my brain adapted pretty quickly, and the standard iPhone never really felt slow or frustrating to use. Now that the iPhone 17 lineup finally brings high refresh rate displays to the regular models as well, that whole justification has mostly disappeared for me. One of the biggest reasons to go Pro no longer feels exclusive, and the standard iPhone suddenly makes a lot more sense than it used to.

The vanilla iPhone is carrying lot more weight than people admit

The regular iPhone has become strangely easy to underestimate, mostly because the conversation around it is always framed by what the Pro models have that it doesn’t. But when you stop comparing spec sheets for a moment and look at the standard iPhone on its own, it is actually an incredibly complete device.

The main camera is already excellent for the kind of photos most people take every day. Performance is rarely an issue either, especially now that the regular models often share the same core chip architecture as the Pro versions. Whether it is social media, gaming, multitasking, editing photos, or juggling a dozen apps at once, the phone handles it all effortlessly. The display is good, battery life has improved a lot over the years, and you still get the same software experience, the same long-term updates, and the same overall reliability that people buy iPhones for in the first place.

And honestly, for the way I actually use a phone — and probably for the way most people use one — the regular iPhone no longer feels like a compromise at all. It only starts to feel “lesser” when you compare it side-by-side with a checklist of Pro-exclusive features.

The moment I realized I was shopping for a fantasy version of myself

I am not trying to convince anyone not to buy a Pro iPhone. For some people, the extra features absolutely make sense. If you shoot a lot of video, regularly use the telephoto camera, care deeply about the premium build, or genuinely benefit from those advanced tools, then the higher price is probably justified. Those are real advantages. But they are also very specific advantages — the kind that come from understanding your own habits, not just getting swept up in the excitement.

Before jumping ship, ask yourself one simple question: Which Pro features do I genuinely use right now? Not the ones that look impressive on paper, but the ones that actually show up in your daily routine. And once you look at your real usage honestly, the answer often becomes much clearer than you expect. Sometimes, the regular iPhone is not the “lesser” choice at all. It is simply the phone that already fits the life you actually live.

I have never been particularly good at managing my phone’s battery health. I know all the advice by now — avoid charging past 80 percent, do not let the battery drain completely, try not to leave the phone plugged in overnight. I know these habits the same way I know I should probably drink more water or sleep earlier. In theory, they make perfect sense. In practice, I rarely stick to them consistently.

So when I started using the Galaxy S26 and realized that Device Care’s optimization features were quietly handling a lot of this for me, my first reaction was skepticism. Phones have offered “smart” protection tools for years now, and most of them tend to disappear into the background after you switch them on once. Half the time, I forget those settings even exist. This felt different, though. Not because it was flashy or constantly reminding me it was there, but because I could actually feel it adapting to how I used my phone, rather than forcing me to change my habits around it.

The battery babysitter I never had to babysit

Device Care on the Galaxy S26 does a lot more than simply stopping charging at 80 percent and calling it a day. Over time, it learns your charging habits and quietly adapts around them. So if you usually plug your phone in overnight, it will charge up to a certain point, pause there for a while, and then finish topping up closer to the time you normally wake up. The idea is to reduce the time the battery spends at 100%, since that is one of the biggest contributors to long-term battery wear.

But the experience goes beyond charging habits. Device Care also keeps an eye on apps running in the background, flags those draining battery, and optimizes performance in subtle ways that don’t constantly interrupt you. In fact, most of the changes were so seamless that I barely noticed them happening. The only reason I realized something was different was when I checked my battery stats and saw how much steadier the battery drain looked compared to the phones I had been using before. Together, it creates the kind of thoughtful, behind-the-scenes experience that actually matters over time. It is about helping your phone age better without requiring you to completely change how you use it every day.

Set it once, forget it gloriously

Setting it up takes less than a minute, and once it is enabled, you mostly never have to think about it again. Here is where to find everything:

• Open Settings and scroll down to Device Care.
• Tap Battery, and scroll down here to see the battery settings.
• Turn on the features you use every day. 
• While you are there, you can also enable Battery Protection if you prefer a stricter approach that caps charging at a percentage level you set.