Latest News

  • TechGeeks Contacts

    Tech Geeks is your trusted source for the latest technology news — from AI and gadgets to mobile, science, and entertainment.

    Got a question, tip, or just want to get in touch? We’re happy to hear from you.

    General Inquiries

    For general questions about our content or website: 📧 hello@techgeeks.news

    Editorial & Tips

    Have a news tip, press release, or a product you’d like us to cover? Drop a line to our editorial team: 📧 editorial@techgeeks.news

    Advertising & Partnerships

    Interested in advertising with Tech Geeks or exploring a collaboration? 📧 ads@techgeeks.news

    Follow Us

    Stay on top of the latest in tech — follow us on social media for daily updates and breaking news.

    Publisher

    Tech Geeks Media

  • OpenAI aims to deliver a universal personal AI assistant to everyone on the planet

    OpenAI aims to deliver a universal personal AI assistant to everyone on the planet

    OpenAI is outlining a future where sophisticated AI reaches billions, not just the corporations and governments scrambling to dominate it. Its newest initiative focuses on an AI for all—a personal AGI that would serve as a highly capable aide for everyday tasks, professional work, and exploration.

    The firm labels this its third phase. After demonstrating that the technology can function and converting it into products that scale, OpenAI now seeks to make powerful AI widely accessible while also driving systems that can speed up scientific discovery and economic progress.

    The challenge lies in converting that ambition into something people can actually use. A personal AGI must be affordable, understandable, and trustworthy, yet OpenAI has provided few details about pricing, rollout timing, geographic coverage, or how access would differ from its existing offerings.

    What a personal AGI could accomplish

    OpenAI is talking about more than a single app feature. It envisions AI systems that help individuals pursue personal goals, generate new knowledge, and reap benefits that would otherwise remain locked inside research labs or large enterprises.

    The most concrete clue is OpenAI’s research timeline. It predicts that AI systems will handle a substantial portion of its own research work alongside human scientists by March 2028, lending weight to the personal AGI concept beyond a mere product tease. The company is tying consumer access to AI that can aid in producing fresh breakthroughs.

    Who governs an AI for everyone

    The access narrative is compelling because a personal AGI would bring advanced assistance directly to the individual. If successful, it could transform how people learn, write, code, plan, research, and decide without depending on an employer, school, or government body.

    Nevertheless, the design authority would remain with OpenAI. The company would dictate the system’s behavior, set its limits, and determine which capabilities are released first. Even an AI intended for universal use would still be delivered through the choices of a single organization.

    When OpenAI must prove itself

    The next hurdle isn’t merely describing a grand vision; it’s demonstrating a personal AGI that feels genuinely useful without being opaque, prohibitively expensive, or out of reach.

    Watch for concrete information on pricing, availability, safety measures, and everyday use cases. Until those details emerge, OpenAI’s all‑knowing AI for everyone remains an ambitious direction, but not yet a product people can plan around.

  • Alogic rolls out touchscreen displays as a makeshift Mac touch solution

    Alogic rolls out touchscreen displays as a makeshift Mac touch solution

    Apple has yet to launch a touchscreen Mac, but macOS 27 Golden Gate hints that the firm is at least getting its desktop OS ready for more touch‑centric interactions. While waiting for actual hardware, Alogic is stepping in with a fresh series of external monitors that add touch and stylus capabilities to both macOS and Windows environments.

    The lineup was revealed at InfoComm 2026 in Las Vegas and includes the wall‑mounted Fokus touchscreens, the Aspekt Touch 27‑inch monitor, Folio portable displays, and an Active Stylus. Windows users have long enjoyed a variety of touch monitors, yet Mac users typically need extra software to achieve comparable functionality on an external screen. Alogic claims its software lets users tap through the UI, annotate, draw, and employ a stylus on supported panels.

    Looking for a touchscreen Mac before Apple delivers one? That’s the core idea behind Alogic’s new range. The Fokus models are the largest, aimed at meeting rooms, classrooms, and collaborative spaces where participants might want to present, annotate, or sketch directly on a big screen. They are offered in 43‑inch, 55‑inch, and 65‑inch sizes, all featuring 4K panels and multitouch support.

    For desk‑bound users, the Aspekt Touch 27‑inch is the more practical choice. It mirrors Alogic’s existing 32‑inch touch monitor but is closer in size to Apple’s Studio Display. The unit sports a 4K panel, 600 nits brightness, 100 % sRGB coverage, USB‑C docking, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4, Ethernet, and 90 W charging. It will be sold in Silver and Space Black, with Raise, Fold, and Omni stand options.

    The Folio series targets people who need extra screen real‑estate away from a fixed workstation. The standard Folio provides a single 16‑inch QHD touch panel, while the Folio Duo adds a second screen that can be stacked vertically or placed side‑by‑side for a wider layout—ideal for traveling MacBook users who still want a multi‑monitor setup.

    Pricing for Alogic’s new Mac‑compatible touch displays

    • Fokus 43‑inch – $2,799
    • Fokus 55‑inch – $3,299
    • Fokus 65‑inch – $3,999
    • Aspekt Touch 27‑inch – starting at $1,799
    • Folio – $899
    • Folio Duo – $1,299
    • Active Stylus with wireless charging – $149
    • Iris 2 4K autofocus webcam – $199

    The Aspekt Touch 27‑inch and Active Stylus are slated for a July 2026 release, while the Fokus, Folio, and Iris 2 are expected by September.


  • Sony’s ambitious PSN login patent could turn the DualSense into a security gatekeeper by Techgeeks

    Sony’s ambitious PSN login patent could turn the DualSense into a security gatekeeper by Techgeeks

    Sony has filed a PSN login patent, first spotted by RespawnFirst, that would pull the DualSense controller into the sign‑in process. A PlayStation console would start the request, then the controller would help confirm that the account holder is close enough to approve access.

    For players, the appeal is easy to see. PSN account abuse can lead to unauthorized purchases, lost access, and attempts to resell established accounts. Sony already offers 2‑step verification and passkeys, but this idea adds a hardware check to the login chain.

    **How would the controller approve access**

    The patent describes a handoff that begins at the console. A PS5 or another PlayStation system would send a sign‑in request, then the controller would scan for a nearby device such as a smartphone. The diagrams show the console, controller, and account screen as separate parts of the same approval flow.

    The controller could use Bluetooth, NFC, proximity sensors, light, sound, or haptic feedback to make contact. After the nearby device responds, credentials would move through the controller and return to the console so the sign‑in can finish.

    **Why would passkeys need backup**

    Passkeys already give PlayStation users a cleaner way to sign in with a stored credential, including through the PlayStation app. Sony’s patent changes the burden on an attacker. A stolen login becomes harder to use if the console also expects a specific controller to join the process.

    There’s a trade‑off, and it isn’t small. A lost, broken, or unavailable DualSense could become a lockout risk unless Sony builds in another way to get back in. The filing doesn’t confirm whether current controllers would support the system, or whether it would require future hardware.

    **Where could the weak spot remain**

    The harder PSN security problem may sit outside the console. Attackers can exploit account recovery by persuading customer support to provide sensitive account access using limited details.

    That leaves Sony with two jobs if this ever becomes real. The controller check would need to be convenient enough for regular players, and account recovery would need tougher guardrails. Until then, the PSN login patent is worth watching, but it shouldn’t be treated as a full answer to account theft.

  • Caviar’s magnetic iPhone 17 Pro Max case costs three times the phone and features a genuine T‑Rex tooth fragment

    Caviar’s magnetic iPhone 17 Pro Max case costs three times the phone and features a genuine T‑Rex tooth fragment

    Caviar has created many outrageously priced custom phones before, but its newest iPhone accessory could be a true crossover (literally). The brand’s new Magnetic Custom Relict is a magnetic case for the iPhone 17 Pro Max, priced at $4,490. The price sounds excessive until you learn what the case contains – a fragment of a Tyrannosaurus fossil set into the tip of its signature check‑mark design.

    It’s pricier than the phone it protects

    Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro Max starts at $1,199 in the US, meaning Caviar’s case costs more than three times the base phone’s price. For that amount, Caviar uses lightweight aviation‑grade titanium for the magnetic panel, alligator leather in a Himalaya hue, and blue jewelry enamel around the decorative check‑mark element.

    The company describes the design as a modern object bearing a trace of prehistoric Earth, giving it a dramatic flair. The case attaches magnetically to the iPhone body, so it isn’t one of Caviar’s full custom iPhone rebuilds. Essentially, you’re purchasing an ultra‑premium backplate that gives the phone a fresh look without permanently altering the device.

    How this becomes a highly exclusive case

    Caviar is limiting this piece to just seven units, which also explains the steep price. Each unit arrives in the brand’s signature gift box and includes a personal certificate. While it may not be the most protective or drop‑resistant case, it will undoubtedly be the most premium and exclusive one available.

  • Asus just priced its RTX 5080 gaming laptop higher than a last-gen RTX 5090 model

    Asus just priced its RTX 5080 gaming laptop higher than a last-gen RTX 5090 model

    Asus has quietly added an RTX 5080 option to the ROG Zephyrus G16 (2026) for buyers in the US, and it is priced at $4,799. 

    That’s odd because last year’s ROG Zephyrus G16 with a more powerful RTX 5090 is currently sitting on Amazon for $4,599. Somehow, Asus has priced a less powerful GPU at a higher price than its predecessor with a better GPU.

    So what exactly does $4,799 buy you?

    The new model pairs Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 5080 with Intel’s Core Ultra 9 386H (Panther Lake) processor, 64GB of RAM, and a boosted TGP of up to 160W, which is 20W more than the RTX 5070 Ti variant, which was the only US option until now. 

    The extra headroom matters, as the RTX 5080 is around 15% faster than the 5070 Ti. The gap could widen in VRAM-heavy titles, especially since the 5080 has 16GB of VRAM while the 5070 Ti maxes out at 12GB. 

    RAM doubles too, from 32GB to 64GB. It also comes in a new silver finish for those who’re interested.

    Does the upgrade actually justify the price jump?

    The new ROG Zephyrus G16 (2026) with the RTX 5080 costs $1,100 more than the one with the RTX 5070 Ti. If you do the math, that’s a 29% price increase, partly due to the more powerful GPU and partly due to double the memory capacity

    The specs, I’d say, are meaningfully better for heavy users. However, I can’t overlook the fact that the 2025 ROG Zephyrus G16, with an RTX 5090 and 64GB of RAM, no less, costs $200 less on Amazon right now.

    If raw GPU performance is your priority, the math doesn’t favor the new model, making the older one a no-brainer for most buyers. Keep in mind that it’s based on Intel’s Arrow Lake architecture.

  • Samsung verifies Exynos 2700 development, likely to power the upcoming Galaxy S27

    Samsung verifies Exynos 2700 development, likely to power the upcoming Galaxy S27

    Samsung has officially announced that work on the Exynos 2700 processor is under way, providing the first direct confirmation that the company’s next high‑end chip is in the pipeline.

    The firm typically equips its Galaxy S flagships with two separate silicon options – some regions receive Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon, while others get Samsung’s own Exynos. Recent years have seen a few deviations: the Galaxy S23 line in 2023 and the Galaxy S25 line in 2025 were launched solely with Snapdragon chips, sparking speculation that the Galaxy S27 might follow suit.

    That scenario now appears less likely. In a recent management briefing reported by Hankyung, Samsung System LSI President Park Yong‑In confirmed that the Exynos 2700 is currently being developed. He said the project is progressing smoothly and that the chip is being prepared for use in “top‑tier smartphones.” While Samsung did not name any specific models, the consensus is that the Galaxy S27 series will be the first to feature the new processor.

    Leaks point to major efficiency gains

    Rumors about the Exynos 2700 have been circulating since 2024. An early leak suggested a 12% performance uplift over the previous generation, while also targeting a 25% reduction in power draw and an 8% shrink in die size.

    Additional reports indicate the chip will be fabricated on Samsung Foundry’s second‑generation 2 nm process, known as SF2P, and that Samsung is developing new thermal‑management technologies to keep efficiency high under load.

    Early benchmark data offers clues

    In April, a Geekbench list believed to belong to an Exynos 2700 engineering sample surfaced online. The scores were roughly comparable to the current Exynos 2600, but the sample achieved them at clock speeds below 3 GHz. This suggests Samsung may be emphasizing efficiency rather than chasing raw benchmark numbers.

    There are also indications that Samsung could introduce a new Heat Path Block (HPB) design for the Exynos 2700, improving cooling. Qualcomm’s forthcoming flagship, likely the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 Pro, is expected to retain higher peak performance, but Samsung may prioritize longer battery life and steadier performance over extended usage periods.

  • Amazon pulls back from Sam Altman film ‘Artificial’ as it may have hit too close to home

    Amazon pulls back from Sam Altman film ‘Artificial’ as it may have hit too close to home

    Amazon MGM Studios just backed out of releasing Artificial, Luca Guadagnino’s movie about OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.

    According to Deadline, the studio confirmed it will no longer distribute the nearly finished film, even though it had been in the works for roughly a year and had already screened well in early test audiences.

    What Artificial is actually about, and why Amazon dropped it?

    Artificial is billed as a comedic drama covering the chaotic five days in 2023 when Altman was abruptly fired by OpenAI’s board. That apparently traced back to Altman trying to push out board member Helen Toner after she praised rival Anthropic Claude‘s safety practices over OpenAI’s own.

    Microsoft swooped in with a job offer almost instantly, and most of OpenAI’s staff threatened to quit in response. Four days later, Altman was back as CEO, with a big chunk of the board replaced. The movie cast includes Andrew Garfield stars as Altman, with Monica Barbaro playing former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati, Yura Borisov as chief scientist Ilya Sutskever, and Ike Barinholtz taking on Elon Musk.

    Amazon told Deadline it has enormous respect for Guadagnino (who made movies like the Challengers) and hopes to keep working with him, but believes Artificial would be better served by a different studio. Other reports also suggest that the movie leans darker than Amazon initially expected, with both Altman and Musk’s characters coming across as the least sympathetic figures on screen.

    Why the timing feels less than coincidental?

    Amazon and OpenAI share a deep financial relationship, with Amazon announcing a $50 billion investment in the AI company earlier this year, including AWS becoming OpenAI’s exclusive cloud partner.

    Altman and Amazon chairman Jeff Bezos also reportedly share a personal friendship, with Altman attending Bezos’s wedding last year. Whether either relationship influenced Amazon’s decision remains unconfirmed, but the optics are hard to ignore.

    Other studios are now being shown the film as talks continue about where it might land next. For now, Artificial is a movie without a home, caught in the middle of the very tech politics it was made to dramatize.

  • Google Health 5.02 restores Hourly Activity and Nap tracking

    Google Health 5.02 restores Hourly Activity and Nap tracking

    Since Google renamed the Fitbit app to Google Health, the platform has been evolving. The latest release, version 5.02, addresses several regressions, bringing back features that vanished during the redesign.

    The most noticeable returns are the Hourly Activity chart and the Nap tracker, both of which had quietly disappeared (as reported by 9to5Google).

    **What’s back in Google Health 5.02?**

    – **Hourly Activity** now shows a graph of your step count for each hour alongside your daily step target. You can re‑add this widget to the Today or Health tab via the customize menu or the pencil icon.

    – **Naps** are back for Android users. Recorded naps appear on dedicated tabs within the daily Sleep Score view, making day‑to‑day comparison easier. iPhone users will receive this functionality with version 5.03.

    – The **Restlessness bar** has been moved directly under the sleep‑stage graph for clearer reading, and the ability to delete or edit sleep sessions works correctly again.

    **Other fixes and enhancements**

    – The Today tab now includes an *Expanded view* that displays more metrics at a glance without the need to swipe. Reordering items on Today has also been streamlined.

    – Nutrition tracking receives three upgrades: faster food‑search results, estimated macronutrients shown before confirming a food entry, and an updated Nutrition tile that shows total calories consumed and remaining calories for the day.

    – Android users see serving sizes and calorie information directly in food‑search results, a feature that will roll out to iOS with version 5.03.

    – You can now delete individual exercise sessions, food logs, and weight entries synced from partner apps straight from Google Health.

    The update is already live for iOS, while Android users are receiving it gradually.

  • AI agents require more than reasoning—they must browse the web

    AI agents require more than reasoning—they must browse the web

    A firm launched an AI‑driven customer‑service assistant that, on paper, was modern and capable enough for the role. The bot went live, but within a week the volume of support tickets actually increased.

    The culprit wasn’t the model; it was the company’s own website. The return‑policy the assistant had to quote lived in a PDF, the shipping calculator was a multi‑step form, and the product specifications were hidden behind a tabbed interface that only loaded after a click. To a human visitor the site works perfectly, but to the AI half of the site effectively doesn’t exist.

    This is the obstacle most agentic AI deployments are confronting today, and it has little to do with the underlying model.

    McKinsey’s 2025 State of AI report shows that 23 % of organisations are already scaling agentic AI in at least one business function, with another 39 % experimenting. The majority of these projects will hit the same wall: a website built for humans being fed to software that needs capabilities humans never required. The next leap for AI agents isn’t sharper reasoning—it’s the capacity to truly navigate and utilise the live internet.

    The three tasks an AI agent must master on the web

    Search. The agent must locate the exact information, not just a list of URLs. For example, if a user asks an insurance chatbot whether a policy covers a specific event, the bot needs to surface the relevant clause, not a generic search‑results page.

    Scrape. After finding the page, the agent has to extract the content cleanly. Modern sites often load data via JavaScript, hide text inside accordions, tabs, or lazy‑loaded sections, so the raw HTML the agent receives can look nothing like what a human sees.

    Interact. This is where most demos crumble in production. Crucial information is frequently hidden behind “load more” buttons, search boxes, multi‑step forms, navigation menus, or login walls. A scraper that only reads static pages can’t reach it; an agent that can click, navigate, fill out forms and submit them can. Interaction is the newest and toughest capability, and it powers the most valuable use cases—price‑comparison shopping assistants, research tools that pull data from interactive dashboards, and support bots that traverse documentation portals just like a real user would.

    Firecrawl builds the underlying layer

    Firecrawl is one of the companies constructing infrastructure that supports all three functions. Its platform sits between AI agents and the live web, handling search, scraping and interaction as managed services behind a single API. The open‑source project has amassed over 120,000 stars on GitHub, and customers such as Lovable, Replit and Zapier run it in production. Nexus Venture Partners led a $14.5 million Series A round in 2025, with Shopify CEO Tobi Lütke joining as an investor after first using Firecrawl as a client.

    The value proposition is simple: an AI agent built on top of Firecrawl doesn’t need custom code for every site it touches. It calls an API, and the platform takes care of rendering JavaScript, navigating dynamic pages, interacting with elements, and returning structured output that the AI can consume.

    “Every AI company needed clean web data and nobody was solving it well,” says Eric Ciarla, co‑founder of Firecrawl. “So we built Firecrawl.”

    Ciarla and his co‑founders ran into the problem while building Mendable, an AI search platform. The search engine worked, but the pipeline that pulled data from each client’s website kept breaking whenever the site changed. Rebuilding fragile extraction code for every new integration was a constant headache—a situation many AI firms face when they try to ingest web data.

    AI is becoming the new discovery channel

    For two decades, the route from “a customer is looking for something” to “the customer finds your business” usually ran through traditional search engines. Today, AI assistants are increasingly the first stop for people seeking recommendations, comparisons or answers. The assistant goes out, gathers information from relevant sites on the user’s behalf, and returns a synthesized response. If the assistant can’t parse your site, your business disappears from its answer.

    Ciarla argues this flips the usual narrative around AI crawlers. Historically, they were seen as unwanted bots that consumed bandwidth without delivering human traffic. That made sense when only search engines were reading sites at scale. Now, when AI agents are the very path humans use to discover information, blocking them is akin to shutting off an emerging discovery channel.

    What sets Firecrawl apart is that it requires no action from the website owner. Most AI‑visibility solutions ask site owners to add markup, expose new endpoints, or restructure pages. Firecrawl works in the opposite direction, automatically converting human‑readable pages into machine‑readable data in real time, without the site owner ever needing to know an AI is looking.

    The ecosystem question

    As agents harvest more data from more sites, the relationship between AI systems and content creators becomes a pressing issue. A model that extracts value from web content without giving anything back to the publishers isn’t sustainable. Publishers are pushing back with lawsuits and access blocks, and major sites are increasingly walling off their content from AI crawlers.

    In March 2026, Firecrawl partnered with Wikimedia Enterprise to route its Wikipedia traffic—2‑3 million requests per month—through Wikimedia’s commercial APIs instead of scraping pages directly. The deal swaps heavy‑handed scraping for paid, structured access and helps support the volunteer community that maintains one of the web’s most‑cited information sources.

    “The community members who write and edit these articles hold immense power in the age of AI,” Ciarla said. “We want to ensure our infrastructure supports their work rather than just consuming it.”

    This partnership is one possible model; similar arrangements may appear as AI products move from demos to large‑scale production. The companies that build the underlying infrastructure will shape how AI interacts with the web.

    What this means for you

    If you’re building AI products, the takeaway is clear: the model is no longer the main differentiator. Frontier models are widely available and the gap between them is narrowing. What separates a production‑ready AI product from a flop is the underlying layer that can actually retrieve the needed information. Investing in that layer can yield significant engineering advantages.

    If you run a business and haven’t considered AI agents reading your website, now is the time to start. The discovery channel is shifting. A customer who once would have found you via a traditional search engine may now rely on an AI assistant. If that assistant can’t read your site, you risk being invisible.

  • Techgeeks: This massive ASUS gaming laptop costs roughly three new MacBook Pros

    Techgeeks: This massive ASUS gaming laptop costs roughly three new MacBook Pros

    Following up on the ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)‘s impressive act, ASUS has built a successor that looks even more ridiculous if you glance at the spec sheet. The ROG Strix Scar 18 (2026) is not a cute little café laptop. The flagship gaming machine is built around a large 18‑inch 4K miniLED display and hardware that embarrasses most desktop PCs.

    But all of this comes at a cost, and you might want to sit down for this one.

    Why the ROG Strix Scar 18 is overkill

    The SCAR 18 is powered by up to an Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus processor and up to an Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop GPU. The GPU can run at up to 175 W, while the laptop can hit up to 320 W of total system power in Manual mode. This is literally hitting entry‑level gaming PC levels of power draw.

    Keeping the beefy specs cool is an end‑to‑end vapor chamber, a sandwiched heatsink, rear exhaust vents, and a tri‑fan cooling setup that pulls air through the keyboard deck.

    It is expensive, obviously

    Even the pricing is just as mind‑boggling, with the starting variant arriving for $4,299. This is the RTX 5080 GPU variant with 32 GB of RAM and 1 TB of SSD storage. In the UK, the RTX 5090 model costs a whopping £5,299, with 64 GB of memory and a 2 TB SSD.

    For context, you can probably buy like seven base MacBook Neos or about three MacBook Pros. Yes, this laptop serves a different purpose, but that comparison shows just how absurd the prices are.

    Your portable desktop replacement

    There are plenty of practical enthusiast touches here. It supports up to 128 GB of DDR5‑6400 RAM and up to 8 TB of PCIe Gen 5 storage, with a tool‑less bottom panel for easier upgrades. You’re not limited to just gaming since the performance would support a wide range of workflows, including high‑end creative projects.

    ASUS built the ROG Strix Scar 18 for someone who wants a giant display and uncompromising performance in a portable form factor, not just gamers.