Category: Technologies

Pool cleaning robots have made huge strides in recent years. What began as basic devices for clearing debris from pool bottoms has transformed into sophisticated systems that can map entire pools, respond to shifting conditions, and perform several upkeep tasks simultaneously. As the demand for smart‑home solutions climbs, pool owners are seeking the same blend of automation, ease, and dependability from their pool‑care gear.

Few manufacturers have embraced this evolution as aggressively as Beatbot. Sold through the Beatbot website and Amazon store, the company has positioned itself as a premium leader in robotic pool care by merging cutting‑edge robotics, AI‑powered vision, and smart navigation into devices that cut down the time and effort needed to keep a pool spotless. This Prime Day, Beatbot’s catalog showcases just how far automated pool maintenance has come, from top‑tier units with real‑time decision‑making to versatile robots that tackle multiple chores in a single cleaning run.

Instead of concentrating on a single product line, Beatbot has spent recent years constructing a wider pool‑care ecosystem driven by advanced robotics, intelligent navigation, and AI‑based automation. From flagship cleaners capable of on‑the‑fly decisions to surface skimmers and more budget‑friendly options, the mission stays consistent: shrink the time, labor, and guesswork traditionally tied to pool upkeep.

Inside Beatbot’s most advanced pool‑care system

The clearest expression of Beatbot’s AI‑centric vision appears in the AquaSense X. This unit merges an autonomous self‑cleaning dock with HybridSense™ AI Vision, CleverNav™ AI Path Planning, AI debris detection, smart obstacle avoidance, auto‑recovery, and night‑time cleaning, delivering a heightened level of awareness and flexibility during cleaning.

The system constantly scans its environment, spots obstacles and debris, and reshapes its cleaning routes in real time to boost coverage across the whole pool. Rather than depending on static cleaning patterns, it adjusts as conditions evolve, yielding a more thorough and efficient clean while cutting down on user involvement.

The autonomous dock reinforces this hands‑free approach. By limiting routine upkeep after each cycle, it lets owners spend less time tending the robot and more time enjoying the water. For those after the most sophisticated option in Beatbot’s lineup, the AquaSense X fuses intelligent navigation, adaptive cleaning, and automated maintenance into a single platform.

Prime Day price: $3,999 (regularly $4,250).

AquaSense 2 Ultra expands intelligent pool maintenance

While many robotic cleaners concentrate on debris removal, the AquaSense 2 Ultra adopts a broader maintenance perspective. Marketed as the world’s first AI‑powered 5‑in‑1 pool robot, it handles floor scrubbing, wall cleaning, waterline polishing, surface skimming, and water clarification all within one system.

HybridSense™ AI Vision and CleverNav™ AI Path Planning enable the AquaSense 2 Ultra to traverse multiple cleaning zones while adapting to shifting pool conditions. Coupled with AI debris detection and smart obstacle avoidance, the robot embodies Beatbot’s “full‑pool intelligence,” allowing it to address diverse tasks from a single platform.

Water clarification sets the AquaSense 2 Ultra apart from conventional robots. Beyond gathering debris, it actively improves water clarity, reducing reliance on extra maintenance tools. For owners seeking a holistic pool‑care solution, it merges cleaning, water treatment, and intelligent automation in one package.

Prime Day price: $1,999 (regularly $3,150).

AquaSense 2 Pro delivers all‑in‑one care

The AquaSense 2 Pro aims to simplify pool upkeep without compromising performance. It combines floor cleaning, wall scrubbing, waterline polishing, surface skimming, and water clarification into a single unit, ideal for owners who want a comprehensive solution without juggling multiple devices.

Features such as the ClearWater™ Clarification System, Smart Water Surface Parking, and one‑tap app retrieval streamline daily ownership, while Full Coverage Path Optimization powered by 22 sensors ensures efficient navigation and consistent cleaning across the pool. By continuously evaluating its surroundings and tweaking routes as needed, the AquaSense 2 Pro provides thorough coverage with minimal user input.

The outcome is a system that unites smart navigation, water care, and multi‑zone cleaning in a practical, user‑friendly way. For those looking for a balance between high‑tech automation and everyday usability, the AquaSense 2 Pro sits comfortably in the middle of Beatbot’s expanding ecosystem.

Prime Day price: $1,699 (regularly $2,299).

The Sora Series brings smarter cleaning to a wider audience

Not every pool owner needs a flagship‑level device, and that’s where Beatbot’s Sora Series steps in.

The Sora 70 is the top model of the line, offering 4‑in‑1 cleaning of the floor, walls, waterline, and surface. By adding dedicated surface cleaning to traditional robotic functions, it achieves broader coverage than many mid‑range competitors. Features like Smart Surface Parking, shallow‑area reach, SonicSense™ AI Ultrasonic Obstacle Avoidance, and intelligent path planning boost cleaning consistency and make retrieval easier after a cycle.

SonicSense™ AI Ultrasonic Obstacle Avoidance and smart path planning help the Sora 70 move more efficiently while enhancing cleaning uniformity throughout the pool. Combined with its 4‑in‑1 capability, these technologies make it one of the strongest choices in Beatbot’s mid‑range catalog.

Prime Day price: $999 (regularly $1,499).

The Sora 30 focuses on delivering solid everyday performance without the premium price tag of flagship models. Its upgraded 3‑in‑1 cleaning handles floors, walls, and waterlines, offering wider coverage and more versatility than many entry‑level cordless cleaners. For newcomers to Beatbot’s ecosystem, it presents an attractive mix of performance, convenience, and value.

While positioned as a more accessible option, the Sora 30 still benefits from Beatbot’s overarching design philosophy: expanded coverage, smarter operation, and reduced manual effort. For owners seeking reliable day‑to‑day maintenance, it serves as a practical gateway into Beatbot’s intelligent pool‑care world.

Prime Day price: $649 (regularly $999).

Prime Day is the perfect moment to upgrade

Beatbot’s Prime Day discounts extend well beyond the flagship units. In addition to offers on the AquaSense X, AquaSense 2 Ultra, AquaSense 2 Pro, Sora 70, and Sora 30, shoppers can save across the broader ecosystem. The Sora 10 drops from $699 to $449, while the AquaSense 2 is available for $799, down from $1,298. Surface‑cleaning tools also see deep cuts, with the iSkim priced at $299 (normally $499) and the iSkim Ultra reduced from $999 to $549.

Running from July 8 through July 11, these promotions represent one of the year’s best chances to upgrade to Beatbot’s AI‑driven pool‑care suite. Whether you need a top‑tier robotic cleaner, an all‑in‑one maintenance system, or a dedicated surface‑cleaning device, the lineup covers a range of pool sizes, care requirements, and budgets.

For pool owners eager to spend less time scrubbing and more time swimming, Prime Day could be the ideal opportunity to make the switch.

While the tech world was busy obsessing over Liquid Glass, smarter Apple Intelligence features, and all the shiny new additions arriving with macOS 27 Golden Gate, Apple quietly slipped in another announcement at WWDC 2026 that didn’t get nearly as much attention. Buried in the compatibility list was a simple but significant detail: Intel Macs are no longer supported. For millions of users, that’s just another software update requirement. For a passionate corner of the internet that has spent nearly two decades bending technology to its will, it’s something far bigger. It’s the end of the traditional Hackintosh era.

If the term sounds unfamiliar, here’s the quick version. A Hackintosh is a regular PC that’s been modified to run macOS instead of Windows or Linux. Using community‑developed bootloaders such as OpenCore and carefully selected hardware, enthusiasts managed to convince Apple’s operating system that it was running on a genuine Mac. The process was anything but straightforward, but for many, that challenge became part of the fun.

At first glance, macOS 27 looks like the software update that finally kills the Hackintosh. But after taking a closer look, another question emerges: did Apple really end the Hackintosh movement, or did it quietly become irrelevant years ago?

From Rebellion to Ritual

To understand why Hackintoshes existed in the first place, it’s worth rewinding the clock by a decade or so. Back then, buying a Mac often meant paying a significant premium. Professional‑grade Macs were expensive, upgrade options were limited, and power users frequently found themselves wishing Apple would simply let them build their own machines. Instead, they built their own anyway.

Developers, video editors, music producers, and hardware enthusiasts began assembling custom PCs using Intel processors and compatible components before installing macOS through carefully configured bootloaders. The result was often a machine that delivered Mac Pro‑level performance for a fraction of the price.

And honestly, it wasn’t just about saving money either. Hackintosh represented freedom. Users could pick their own motherboard, upgrade their storage whenever they wanted, swap graphics cards, overclock CPUs, and build systems tailored to their exact needs while still enjoying macOS, Final Cut Pro, Logic Pro, Xcode, AirDrop, and the rest of Apple’s software ecosystem.

Entire online communities formed around the movement. Compatibility databases, troubleshooting guides, and OpenCore configurations became shared knowledge. Successfully booting into macOS on unsupported hardware felt less like installing an operating system and more like completing a puzzle.

Apple didn’t kill it overnight

It’s tempting to look at macOS 27 and declare that Apple has finally killed the Hackintosh. That isn’t entirely true. The real countdown began in 2020 with the launch of Apple Silicon and the original M1 chip.

At the time, many viewed it as another architectural transition that would take years to settle. Instead, Apple delivered processors that combined impressive performance with exceptional efficiency, setting new benchmarks for battery life and thermals while steadily improving with each generation. As Apple Silicon matured, macOS itself increasingly evolved around Apple’s own hardware.

The end of Hackintosh wasn’t sudden. It was six years in the making.

The end of Hackintosh wasn’t sudden. It was six years in the making.

Meanwhile, Intel‑based Hackintosh projects remained functional but slowly became stranded on older assumptions. The community adapted impressively, but every new release widened the gap between Apple’s vertically integrated ecosystem and the generic PC hardware it once managed to emulate. macOS 26 effectively became the final stop for traditional x86 Hackintoshes. macOS 27 simply makes that reality official. Rather than dramatically shutting the door, Apple has quietly walked into a future where its operating system is designed exclusively around its own silicon.

Remember when the copy was better than the original?

One detail that’s often forgotten is that Hackintoshes weren’t merely cheaper than Macs. In many cases, they were faster. It wasn’t unusual to see creators building massive workstations with desktop Core i9 processors, Xeons, multiple GPUs, and enormous amounts of RAM that comfortably outperformed Apple’s own offerings. For years, building a Hackintosh wasn’t just about avoiding the so‑called Apple Tax. It was about getting better hardware while still enjoying macOS. Fast‑forward to 2026, and the script has completely flipped.

The hackintosh subreddit is filled with goodbye posts and pictures of new M4 Mac minis.5-years-ago, I was building PCs to run macOS because Mac hardware was abysmal.Now, people want Apple’s hardware to run Windows and Linux because it’s so good.How the turntables…

— Quinn Nelson (@SnazzyLabs) January 1, 2025

Apple Silicon has transformed Macs into some of the most efficient computers on the market. Performance‑per‑watt has become a genuine competitive advantage, unified memory has proven remarkably capable for many professional workloads, and battery life on Apple’s notebooks continues to impress. Ironically, one of the biggest reasons people stopped building Hackintoshes is that Apple’s own hardware became genuinely difficult to beat.

Is Apple actually a good value now?

If someone had said this ten years ago, they probably would’ve been laughed out of the room. Yet here we are. One of the biggest reasons Hackintosh existed was simple economics. Many users wanted macOS but couldn’t justify spending thousands on Apple hardware. Today’s landscape looks very different.

The MacBook Neo has opened the ecosystem to students and first‑time buyers. The MacBook Air has become one of the easiest laptops to recommend thanks to its blend of portability, battery life, and performance. Professionals needing more horsepower can turn to the MacBook Pro lineup, which comfortably handles video editing, software development, AI workloads, and demanding creative tasks.

The Mac mini deserves special mention, too. A few years ago, people built Hackintoshes because they wanted Apple’s software but didn’t want Apple’s hardware. Now, many buyers are purchasing Mac minis primarily because they want Apple’s hardware. Its compact size, impressive efficiency, strong CPU performance, and excellent memory architecture have made it increasingly popular for home labs, local AI projects, and OpenClaw‑style deployments.

The problem that slowly disappeared

Here’s the funny thing about Hackintoshes: they were never really about spending hours tweaking bootloaders, hunting down obscure kexts, or praying that the next software update wouldn’t break everything. They existed because they solved a very real problem. People wanted macOS without emptying their wallets, wanted workstation‑class performance without Apple’s price tag, and wanted the freedom to swap GPUs, add RAM, or upgrade storage whenever they pleased. In many ways, Hackintosh wasn’t just a project; it was a rebellion against expensive, locked‑down hardware.

Fast‑forward to 2026, and that rebellion has started running out of things to rebel against. Apple Silicon has narrowed the performance gap, entry‑level Macs have become far more accessible, and the company’s hardware is finally easy to recommend without an awkward disclaimer attached. On the other side, for users simply trying to extend the life of an aging Intel desktop, lightweight Linux distributions have also matured into polished, capable alternatives that often make more sense than trying to force unsupported versions of macOS onto legacy hardware.

Now, that’s not to say existing Hackintoshes suddenly become useless. Systems running macOS 26 will continue serving many owners perfectly well for years. But for anyone thinking of building a brand‑new Hackintosh today just to experience macOS, the obvious question isn’t “Can you?”, but actually, “Why would you?”

The ARM dream that probably stays a dream

Of course, the internet being the internet, someone has already asked the obvious question: “What if Hackintosh just moves to ARM?” After all, Snapdragon laptops have been here for a while, and the new NVIDIA RTX Spark laptops definitely seem quite powerful.

Then again, Apple Silicon isn’t just another ARM chip. It’s a tightly woven cocktail of custom hardware, proprietary technologies, and software optimizations that are designed to work together like a perfectly choreographed dance routine. Recreating all of that would be a monumental engineering headache.

Could someone eventually pull it off? Maybe. But the bigger question is: if you’re already buying a shiny new ARM laptop because you want macOS, wouldn’t it be a whole lot easier to just… buy a Mac?

Out with a Chime

The Hackintosh deserves to be remembered as one of the internet’s greatest engineering side quests. For years, it brought together thousands of enthusiasts who documented hardware compatibility, wrote guides, built tools, and helped strangers run macOS on machines Apple never intended. It wasn’t just about saving money. It was about curiosity, freedom, and proving that with enough determination, almost anything was possible.

Ironically, the Hackintosh wasn’t ultimately defeated by lawsuits or software lockouts. It simply outlived the problem it was created to solve. Apple’s shift to Apple Silicon and increasingly compelling hardware lineup made the need for a Hackintosh steadily fade away, long before macOS 27 officially ended the journey. And honestly? That’s probably the best ending this story could have asked for.

OpenAI is outlining a future where sophisticated AI reaches billions, not just the corporations and governments scrambling to dominate it. Its newest initiative focuses on an AI for all—a personal AGI that would serve as a highly capable aide for everyday tasks, professional work, and exploration.

The firm labels this its third phase. After demonstrating that the technology can function and converting it into products that scale, OpenAI now seeks to make powerful AI widely accessible while also driving systems that can speed up scientific discovery and economic progress.

The challenge lies in converting that ambition into something people can actually use. A personal AGI must be affordable, understandable, and trustworthy, yet OpenAI has provided few details about pricing, rollout timing, geographic coverage, or how access would differ from its existing offerings.

What a personal AGI could accomplish

OpenAI is talking about more than a single app feature. It envisions AI systems that help individuals pursue personal goals, generate new knowledge, and reap benefits that would otherwise remain locked inside research labs or large enterprises.

The most concrete clue is OpenAI’s research timeline. It predicts that AI systems will handle a substantial portion of its own research work alongside human scientists by March 2028, lending weight to the personal AGI concept beyond a mere product tease. The company is tying consumer access to AI that can aid in producing fresh breakthroughs.

Who governs an AI for everyone

The access narrative is compelling because a personal AGI would bring advanced assistance directly to the individual. If successful, it could transform how people learn, write, code, plan, research, and decide without depending on an employer, school, or government body.

Nevertheless, the design authority would remain with OpenAI. The company would dictate the system’s behavior, set its limits, and determine which capabilities are released first. Even an AI intended for universal use would still be delivered through the choices of a single organization.

When OpenAI must prove itself

The next hurdle isn’t merely describing a grand vision; it’s demonstrating a personal AGI that feels genuinely useful without being opaque, prohibitively expensive, or out of reach.

Watch for concrete information on pricing, availability, safety measures, and everyday use cases. Until those details emerge, OpenAI’s all‑knowing AI for everyone remains an ambitious direction, but not yet a product people can plan around.

Apple has yet to launch a touchscreen Mac, but macOS 27 Golden Gate hints that the firm is at least getting its desktop OS ready for more touch‑centric interactions. While waiting for actual hardware, Alogic is stepping in with a fresh series of external monitors that add touch and stylus capabilities to both macOS and Windows environments.

The lineup was revealed at InfoComm 2026 in Las Vegas and includes the wall‑mounted Fokus touchscreens, the Aspekt Touch 27‑inch monitor, Folio portable displays, and an Active Stylus. Windows users have long enjoyed a variety of touch monitors, yet Mac users typically need extra software to achieve comparable functionality on an external screen. Alogic claims its software lets users tap through the UI, annotate, draw, and employ a stylus on supported panels.

Looking for a touchscreen Mac before Apple delivers one? That’s the core idea behind Alogic’s new range. The Fokus models are the largest, aimed at meeting rooms, classrooms, and collaborative spaces where participants might want to present, annotate, or sketch directly on a big screen. They are offered in 43‑inch, 55‑inch, and 65‑inch sizes, all featuring 4K panels and multitouch support.

For desk‑bound users, the Aspekt Touch 27‑inch is the more practical choice. It mirrors Alogic’s existing 32‑inch touch monitor but is closer in size to Apple’s Studio Display. The unit sports a 4K panel, 600 nits brightness, 100 % sRGB coverage, USB‑C docking, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4, Ethernet, and 90 W charging. It will be sold in Silver and Space Black, with Raise, Fold, and Omni stand options.

The Folio series targets people who need extra screen real‑estate away from a fixed workstation. The standard Folio provides a single 16‑inch QHD touch panel, while the Folio Duo adds a second screen that can be stacked vertically or placed side‑by‑side for a wider layout—ideal for traveling MacBook users who still want a multi‑monitor setup.

Pricing for Alogic’s new Mac‑compatible touch displays

• Fokus 43‑inch – $2,799
• Fokus 55‑inch – $3,299
• Fokus 65‑inch – $3,999
• Aspekt Touch 27‑inch – starting at $1,799
• Folio – $899
• Folio Duo – $1,299
• Active Stylus with wireless charging – $149
• Iris 2 4K autofocus webcam – $199

The Aspekt Touch 27‑inch and Active Stylus are slated for a July 2026 release, while the Fokus, Folio, and Iris 2 are expected by September.

Sony has filed a PSN login patent, first spotted by RespawnFirst, that would pull the DualSense controller into the sign‑in process. A PlayStation console would start the request, then the controller would help confirm that the account holder is close enough to approve access.

For players, the appeal is easy to see. PSN account abuse can lead to unauthorized purchases, lost access, and attempts to resell established accounts. Sony already offers 2‑step verification and passkeys, but this idea adds a hardware check to the login chain.

**How would the controller approve access**

The patent describes a handoff that begins at the console. A PS5 or another PlayStation system would send a sign‑in request, then the controller would scan for a nearby device such as a smartphone. The diagrams show the console, controller, and account screen as separate parts of the same approval flow.

The controller could use Bluetooth, NFC, proximity sensors, light, sound, or haptic feedback to make contact. After the nearby device responds, credentials would move through the controller and return to the console so the sign‑in can finish.

**Why would passkeys need backup**

Passkeys already give PlayStation users a cleaner way to sign in with a stored credential, including through the PlayStation app. Sony’s patent changes the burden on an attacker. A stolen login becomes harder to use if the console also expects a specific controller to join the process.

There’s a trade‑off, and it isn’t small. A lost, broken, or unavailable DualSense could become a lockout risk unless Sony builds in another way to get back in. The filing doesn’t confirm whether current controllers would support the system, or whether it would require future hardware.

**Where could the weak spot remain**

The harder PSN security problem may sit outside the console. Attackers can exploit account recovery by persuading customer support to provide sensitive account access using limited details.

That leaves Sony with two jobs if this ever becomes real. The controller check would need to be convenient enough for regular players, and account recovery would need tougher guardrails. Until then, the PSN login patent is worth watching, but it shouldn’t be treated as a full answer to account theft.

Caviar has created many outrageously priced custom phones before, but its newest iPhone accessory could be a true crossover (literally). The brand’s new Magnetic Custom Relict is a magnetic case for the iPhone 17 Pro Max, priced at $4,490. The price sounds excessive until you learn what the case contains – a fragment of a Tyrannosaurus fossil set into the tip of its signature check‑mark design.

It’s pricier than the phone it protects

Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro Max starts at $1,199 in the US, meaning Caviar’s case costs more than three times the base phone’s price. For that amount, Caviar uses lightweight aviation‑grade titanium for the magnetic panel, alligator leather in a Himalaya hue, and blue jewelry enamel around the decorative check‑mark element.

The company describes the design as a modern object bearing a trace of prehistoric Earth, giving it a dramatic flair. The case attaches magnetically to the iPhone body, so it isn’t one of Caviar’s full custom iPhone rebuilds. Essentially, you’re purchasing an ultra‑premium backplate that gives the phone a fresh look without permanently altering the device.

How this becomes a highly exclusive case

Caviar is limiting this piece to just seven units, which also explains the steep price. Each unit arrives in the brand’s signature gift box and includes a personal certificate. While it may not be the most protective or drop‑resistant case, it will undoubtedly be the most premium and exclusive one available.

Asus has quietly added an RTX 5080 option to the ROG Zephyrus G16 (2026) for buyers in the US, and it is priced at $4,799. 

That’s odd because last year’s ROG Zephyrus G16 with a more powerful RTX 5090 is currently sitting on Amazon for $4,599. Somehow, Asus has priced a less powerful GPU at a higher price than its predecessor with a better GPU.

So what exactly does $4,799 buy you?

The new model pairs Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 5080 with Intel’s Core Ultra 9 386H (Panther Lake) processor, 64GB of RAM, and a boosted TGP of up to 160W, which is 20W more than the RTX 5070 Ti variant, which was the only US option until now. 

The extra headroom matters, as the RTX 5080 is around 15% faster than the 5070 Ti. The gap could widen in VRAM-heavy titles, especially since the 5080 has 16GB of VRAM while the 5070 Ti maxes out at 12GB. 

RAM doubles too, from 32GB to 64GB. It also comes in a new silver finish for those who’re interested.

Does the upgrade actually justify the price jump?

The new ROG Zephyrus G16 (2026) with the RTX 5080 costs $1,100 more than the one with the RTX 5070 Ti. If you do the math, that’s a 29% price increase, partly due to the more powerful GPU and partly due to double the memory capacity. 

The specs, I’d say, are meaningfully better for heavy users. However, I can’t overlook the fact that the 2025 ROG Zephyrus G16, with an RTX 5090 and 64GB of RAM, no less, costs $200 less on Amazon right now.

If raw GPU performance is your priority, the math doesn’t favor the new model, making the older one a no-brainer for most buyers. Keep in mind that it’s based on Intel’s Arrow Lake architecture.

Samsung has officially announced that work on the Exynos 2700 processor is under way, providing the first direct confirmation that the company’s next high‑end chip is in the pipeline.

The firm typically equips its Galaxy S flagships with two separate silicon options – some regions receive Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon, while others get Samsung’s own Exynos. Recent years have seen a few deviations: the Galaxy S23 line in 2023 and the Galaxy S25 line in 2025 were launched solely with Snapdragon chips, sparking speculation that the Galaxy S27 might follow suit.

That scenario now appears less likely. In a recent management briefing reported by Hankyung, Samsung System LSI President Park Yong‑In confirmed that the Exynos 2700 is currently being developed. He said the project is progressing smoothly and that the chip is being prepared for use in “top‑tier smartphones.” While Samsung did not name any specific models, the consensus is that the Galaxy S27 series will be the first to feature the new processor.

Leaks point to major efficiency gains

Rumors about the Exynos 2700 have been circulating since 2024. An early leak suggested a 12% performance uplift over the previous generation, while also targeting a 25% reduction in power draw and an 8% shrink in die size.

Additional reports indicate the chip will be fabricated on Samsung Foundry’s second‑generation 2 nm process, known as SF2P, and that Samsung is developing new thermal‑management technologies to keep efficiency high under load.

Early benchmark data offers clues

In April, a Geekbench list believed to belong to an Exynos 2700 engineering sample surfaced online. The scores were roughly comparable to the current Exynos 2600, but the sample achieved them at clock speeds below 3 GHz. This suggests Samsung may be emphasizing efficiency rather than chasing raw benchmark numbers.

There are also indications that Samsung could introduce a new Heat Path Block (HPB) design for the Exynos 2700, improving cooling. Qualcomm’s forthcoming flagship, likely the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 Pro, is expected to retain higher peak performance, but Samsung may prioritize longer battery life and steadier performance over extended usage periods.

Amazon MGM Studios just backed out of releasing Artificial, Luca Guadagnino’s movie about OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.

According to Deadline, the studio confirmed it will no longer distribute the nearly finished film, even though it had been in the works for roughly a year and had already screened well in early test audiences.

What Artificial is actually about, and why Amazon dropped it?

Artificial is billed as a comedic drama covering the chaotic five days in 2023 when Altman was abruptly fired by OpenAI’s board. That apparently traced back to Altman trying to push out board member Helen Toner after she praised rival Anthropic Claude‘s safety practices over OpenAI’s own.

Microsoft swooped in with a job offer almost instantly, and most of OpenAI’s staff threatened to quit in response. Four days later, Altman was back as CEO, with a big chunk of the board replaced. The movie cast includes Andrew Garfield stars as Altman, with Monica Barbaro playing former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati, Yura Borisov as chief scientist Ilya Sutskever, and Ike Barinholtz taking on Elon Musk.

Amazon told Deadline it has enormous respect for Guadagnino (who made movies like the Challengers) and hopes to keep working with him, but believes Artificial would be better served by a different studio. Other reports also suggest that the movie leans darker than Amazon initially expected, with both Altman and Musk’s characters coming across as the least sympathetic figures on screen.

Why the timing feels less than coincidental?

Amazon and OpenAI share a deep financial relationship, with Amazon announcing a $50 billion investment in the AI company earlier this year, including AWS becoming OpenAI’s exclusive cloud partner.

Altman and Amazon chairman Jeff Bezos also reportedly share a personal friendship, with Altman attending Bezos’s wedding last year. Whether either relationship influenced Amazon’s decision remains unconfirmed, but the optics are hard to ignore.

Other studios are now being shown the film as talks continue about where it might land next. For now, Artificial is a movie without a home, caught in the middle of the very tech politics it was made to dramatize.

Since Google renamed the Fitbit app to Google Health, the platform has been evolving. The latest release, version 5.02, addresses several regressions, bringing back features that vanished during the redesign.

The most noticeable returns are the Hourly Activity chart and the Nap tracker, both of which had quietly disappeared (as reported by 9to5Google).

**What’s back in Google Health 5.02?**

– **Hourly Activity** now shows a graph of your step count for each hour alongside your daily step target. You can re‑add this widget to the Today or Health tab via the customize menu or the pencil icon.

– **Naps** are back for Android users. Recorded naps appear on dedicated tabs within the daily Sleep Score view, making day‑to‑day comparison easier. iPhone users will receive this functionality with version 5.03.

– The **Restlessness bar** has been moved directly under the sleep‑stage graph for clearer reading, and the ability to delete or edit sleep sessions works correctly again.

**Other fixes and enhancements**

– The Today tab now includes an *Expanded view* that displays more metrics at a glance without the need to swipe. Reordering items on Today has also been streamlined.

– Nutrition tracking receives three upgrades: faster food‑search results, estimated macronutrients shown before confirming a food entry, and an updated Nutrition tile that shows total calories consumed and remaining calories for the day.

– Android users see serving sizes and calorie information directly in food‑search results, a feature that will roll out to iOS with version 5.03.

– You can now delete individual exercise sessions, food logs, and weight entries synced from partner apps straight from Google Health.

The update is already live for iOS, while Android users are receiving it gradually.