Latest News

  • Foldable Phones Had a Breakout Year in 2023. Should You Buy One?

    Foldable Phones Had a Breakout Year in 2023. Should You Buy One?

    Foldable phones are still niche, but in 2023 you can find one from almost every major smartphone maker. While there’s more choice than ever before, it can still be a challenge to know whether buying a foldable phone is the right decision.

    Foldable phones have been available for almost half a decade, with the first models from Samsung and Huawei having in 2019. But their high prices, limited software functionality and fragile designs initially made them hard to recommend.

    A lot has changed over the last four years. Not only are there more options, but cheaper devices like Motorola’s $700 Razr (2023), which arrived in October, are starting to emerge. And while there’s still plenty of room for the software experience to evolve and improve, companies like Samsung, Google and Motorola made strides in 2023.

    The larger outer screens on Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip 5 and Motorola’s Razr Plus, for example, make it possible to actually use apps without opening your phone rather than just checking notifications. Google’s Pixel Fold has a new language translation feature that leverages both the external and internal screens.

    More foldables launched this year than ever before, with new devices from Samsung, Motorola, OnePlus, Google, and Oppo hitting the market. Sales of foldable phones are expected to increase this year, with the International Data Corporation reporting a 43.9% boost compared to 2022 and Counterpoint Research pointing to a 10% bump in the second quarter of 2023 alone.

    If you’re thinking about buying a foldable phone, consider your budget and how you intend to use your phone, among other factors. Check out CNET’s list of the best flip phones and best foldable phones to learn more about our top picks.

    What’s your budget?

    The most important question to ask is how much you’re willing to spend on a new phone. Even though foldable phones aren’t as expensive as they were back in 2019, they’re still significantly pricier than most standard phones. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 and Google Pixel Fold, for example, start at $1,800 without a trade-in, while the Galaxy Z Flip 5 and Motorola Razr Plus cost $1,000. Motorola’s 2023 Razr is the cheapest of the bunch at $700, but you have to sacrifice that larger external screen in exchange.

    Motorola Razr 2023

    Book-style foldable phones like the Galaxy Z Fold 5, OnePlus Open ($1,700) and Pixel Fold are among the most expensive phones you can buy. But flip phones are priced around the same as premium non-folding devices like the iPhone 15 Pro and Pixel 8 Pro, both of which start at around $1,000. So if you’re used to budgeting for a device in that price range, splurging on a flip phone won’t feel much different.

    Don’t forget to keep an eye out for discounts and trade-in deals to make those prices more palatable. But keep in mind that many of those deals usually ask that you meet some type of requirement, like opening a new line with a carrier or trading in a relatively recent phone.

    Are you careful with your phone?

    Google's Pixel Fold phone

    While today’s foldables are sturdier than earlier models, the simple fact that they have hinges and bendable screens still makes them more delicate than regular phones. Shortly after Google launched the Pixel Fold in June, some Reddit users reported broken screens, for example. Most foldable phones aren’t dust resistant and have a lower water resistance rating than standard devices like the Pixel 8 and Galaxy S23 lineup.

    If you work outdoors, have a tendency to drop your phone or handle it roughly or prefer not to use a case, you’ll want to be careful when switching to a foldable phone. It’s also a good idea to familiarize yourself with repair options from the device maker as well as third-party services.

    Is it the right time to buy a foldable phone?

    Watching YouTube on the OnePlus Open

    Like many electronics, foldable phones are often released on a seasonal basis. You’ll want to consider this to avoid spending $1,000 or more on a device that may soon feel outdated. While you can sometimes find compelling discounts on older models, it’s usually a good idea to opt for the latest version if you can.

    Companies only usually support their phones with new versions of Android for a few years. The Galaxy Z Flip 5 and Z Fold 5 will get four generations of OS upgrades, for instance, while the Pixel Fold and Razr Plus get three years of Android platform updates. Buying the newest model ensures that your phone will continue to get software updates for as long as possible.

    Samsung typically releases its new foldable phones around August, although it introduced the Galaxy Z Flip 5 and Z Fold 5 slightly earlier than usual this year in July. If Google releases new Pixel Fold devices on an annual pattern, we can expect the second-generation model in June. Motorola hasn’t followed an annual cycle with its Razr phones, but the high-end Razr Plus also arrived in June while the cheaper model debuted in the US in October. The OnePlus Open, which is the brand’s first foldable phone, also launched in October.

    The Black Friday shopping weekend is also a great time to look out for deals on foldables, especially since new models for the year have already launched. The Galaxy Z Fold 4 was on sale last year, and Samsung also held its own Cyber Week sale around the same time.

    What do you want from a new phone?

    Samsung's new Galaxy Z Fold 5 phone

    This is probably the most significant consideration aside from your budget. Foldable phones are expensive and have some shortcomings compared to regular phones.

    For example, they can sometimes feel bulky and awkward to use when closed thanks to their unconventional designs. The cameras on foldable phones often aren’t as advanced as the ones you’ll find on premium non-folding phones like the iPhone 15 Pro, Galaxy S23 Ultra and Pixel 8 Pro. There’s also a slight learning curve that comes with using a foldable phone for the first time, especially for larger book-style foldables. And most importantly, many of today’s foldables still have a visible crease that runs across the screen.

    But those compromises can be worth it for the right audience. If you watch videos and play games on your phone often, a phone-tablet hybrid like the Galaxy Z Fold or Pixel Fold could be worth it. When I switched to the Galaxy Z Fold 4 for several weeks earlier this year, I loved having a larger canvas for writing and reading emails. I even left my tablet at home during a flight and used my phone solely for watching Netflix on the plane. Think long and hard about whether you need a phone that can double as a tablet and are willing to pay a higher price for that benefit.

    Flip phones are for those who want a regular-sized phone that can fit in pockets and purses more easily. Since phones like the Motorola Razr and Galaxy Z Flip essentially have a built-in kickstand, they’re also ideal for those who like to take selfies and group photos without finding someone else to take the picture.

    The Razr Plus half open on a green table

    Newer flip phones like the Galaxy Z Flip 5 and Motorola Razr Plus also have cover screens that allow you to run full apps when the device is closed. Not only does this make it easier to quickly check Google Maps or Spotify from the palm of your hand, but I find that it can turn my phone into a mini smart display. When I tested the Razr Plus, for example, I enjoyed propping it open like a tent to play music, view album art and skip to the next song in my playlist while doing household chores.

    With that in mind, flip phones are best for those who prioritize convenience and portability above almost everything else in a smartphone.

    Overall, deciding whether to buy a foldable phone comes down to your budget and what you’re looking for in a new phone. Factors like durability and timing are also important to consider, but it all comes down to how much you’re willing to spend and what you’re hoping to get from your device. What is certain, though, is that 2023 was a big year for foldable phones, and they’re likely to continue improving in 2024 and beyond.

  • Meta Quest 2 Revisited: For Its Price, Stil the Best VR Headset

    Meta Quest 2 Revisited: For Its Price, Stil the Best VR Headset

    Editor’s note, Aug. 12: The Quest 2 increased in price Aug. 1 by $101. That makes it less of an impulse purchase, but still a CNET Editors’ Choice for now. Below is our updated review.


    There’s a pair of magic goggles I’ve gone back to again and again over the last two years, opening up worlds of games, theater, conversations, art and experiences that are tough to even describe. The Meta Quest 2 (formerly, and sometimes still, the Oculus Quest 2) is an improved, less expensive sequel to the 2019 Oculus Quest. It’s already been my portable holodeck, my little magic fitness room, my escape space and one of my favorite game consoles.

    However, it’s no longer the budget buy it once was. A surprise $101 increase in the headset’s price means that hardware that used to cost $299 for 128GB of storage and $399 for 256GB is now $400 or $500. That’s a big price jump for aging hardware, even if Meta is offering a free download of Beat Saber as a $30 consolation prize. In a year when everything seems to be getting more expensive, it feels like an unwelcome slap in the face.

    Does that mean you should hold off on buying it? All indications are that Meta’s next pro-level VR headset coming later this year will be even more expensive, and a true Quest 3 may not come until 2023 or later. But the reality is, there isn’t any standalone VR headset in existence with the app library or value that the Quest 2 has, even at its higher price.

    Meta upgraded the base storage on the entry-level Quest 2 last year, doubling it from 64GB to 128GB. 128GB should be more than enough storage for most, but serious VR gamers will appreciate the 256GB storage tier step-up — there’s no way to expand storage otherwise.

    While the Quest 2 is aging, it keeps impressing me. The Quest 2 keeps improving its software: It can get phone notifications, pair with keyboards and connect with virtual meeting apps, do basic fitness tracking and wirelessly stream from PCs. It’s still the best self-contained VR headset right now, and the most affordable for its features.

    But, yeah, you have to accept that this is Facebook’s world (and that involves possibilities for future ads, too). While the Quest will soon allow account creation without using a Facebook login, it’s still worth keeping in mind the Quest 2 isn’t designed for kids, even though lots of parents I know have kids who use it. Parental controls are steadily being added, but they’re still not at the level of everyday game consoles like the Nintendo Switch, Xbox or PlayStation.

    The Quest 2 has a VR-optimized Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2 processor, a higher-resolution display than the older Oculus Quest and Rift headsets, and it works surprisingly well as a tethered or wireless PC VR headset, in case you need it to.

    I find I use the Quest 2 mainly as a game console, or a fitness device, or as a social tool for meeting with friends in virtual worlds. I don’t use it all the time. It’s an experience I dip into once in a while.

    If you think of the Quest 2 as a game console, it’s a fantastic little game and experience machine. It might even be my second-favorite game console right now next to the Nintendo Switch. But if you imagine it fulfilling needs for work and the rest of your life, it raises deeper questions and complications.

    Oculus Quest 2: How the VR Headset Compares to the First Quest

    See all photos

    Mark Zuckerberg and Meta remain focused on trying to turn VR into a better work and connectivity tool, but all of that’s still very much a work in progress. There are work apps in the Quest app library, but none of them work well enough for me to use them. Horizon Worlds and Horizon Workrooms are trying to build out social places for work and play.

    Meta’s social media ambitions are clearly aligned where VR and AR are heading, and the Quest 2 still feels like the centerpiece of those efforts. Meta is allowing accounts to bypass needing a Facebook account login soon, but to be clear, you’ll still be under Meta’s umbrella in some way or another.

    Read more: Why You Should Buy a Nintendo Switch Lite and Oculus Quest 2, Instead of PS5 or Xbox Series X

    More game console than work device

    If you treat the Quest 2 as a motion-enabled game console for your face and hands, or a way to socialize with friends in magic worlds where you can run around as invented avatars, it’s fantastic. It’s also a great little machine for playing Beat Saber. The Oculus Quest was already the best self-contained VR headset on the planet, and the Quest 2 is even better.

    The experiences I’ve had in Oculus Quest have been surprising and strange, magical and active. The Quest 2 looks to be walking that same path with its curated app store and self-contained ecosystem. The full-motion six degrees of freedom (aka 6DoF) tracking, using four in-headset cameras, is all the same right now. The controllers are complex but well-designed. It’s more of a VR mini game console than anything, but its other tools — virtual big-screen computer monitors, fitness training software, immersive theater portals — could add dimensions you may not even have considered.

    There are work tools in the Quest ecosystem, and ways to have virtual meetings: Spatial’s app brings people into shared spaces with workflows and cloud storage tools. Virtual monitor apps like Immerse can turn the Quest into a virtual series of monitors for your real computer. Plug in a USB cable, and the Quest 2 can be a PC VR headset and work with a lot of Steam apps as well. Meta’s Horizon Workrooms shows possibilities, too. I’d still consider these work apps experimental right now, though, and not essential.

    Still, the Quest doesn’t really interface with Apple iOS or Google’s Android OS, although it pairs with a phone app like a smartwatch for some basic syncing and screen casting. You can’t just hop into a Zoom call or share a doc, and the flow between my virtual computer work life and the VR virtual flow isn’t there yet. I hope it can arrive because in my opinion, VR headsets should be more like immersive visual headphones. Right now they’re more like customized and different toolkits with positives (physical immersion) and negatives (no face-to-face camera conversation, and no easy work tools like a mouse and keyboard).

    A great example of VR’s limits is the Quest 2’s still-evolving hand tracking. I can use my hands to reach out and touch things, controller-free, which is wild. But I can’t get physical feedback, and mastering the specific gestures needed to open an app, drag an object somewhere or type a response to a message feels extremely difficult.

    Oculus Quest 2 and two controllers

    What’s excellent

    The display resolution:The 1,832×1,920-per-eye pixel resolution is improved from the 1,400×1,600 on the older Quest, and it makes everything smoother, removing a lot of the “screen door” pixelation. The Snapdragon XR2 processor also cuts down on the lower-res halo on the edges of the display that happened previously due to fixed foveated rendering (which only made the center of the display look ultrasharp to help the older processor). It’s more universally clean and crisp now, although there is still some pixelation at the edge of your vision if you look carefully.

    Oculus Quest 2 side showing ports

    Built-in audio doesn’t need headphones: The ambient spatial audio that comes out of the side straps is fine, and I prefer it to using headphones. It sounds a bit better to me than the first Quest. There’s also a 3.5mm headphone jack.

    The XR2 chip looks pretty versatile, still: Qualcomm’s XR2 chip remains the best standalone processor for VR at the moment, and VR graphics on recent games have been pretty impressive. The Quest 2 can also handle hand tracking and mixed reality by overlaying virtual objects with its black and white passthrough cameras.

    inside the Oculus Quest 2

    The refresh rate is smooth:The first Quest could run at 72Hz, a bit less than PC VR headsets that can go to 90Hz. The faster the refresh rate, the smoother the experience. The Quest 2 can even do 120Hz for some games and apps.

    The size and weight aren’t bad: The Quest 2, at 17.7 ounces, or 503 grams, is not super light, but it’s still pretty portable for a self-contained headset. It’s still a pair of goggles, but it’s possible to carry it around. The elastic flex straps are easy to pack down, too, although the Quest 2 still isn’t as portable as an iPad or a Nintendo Switch.

    Oculus Quest 2 controllers

    Great controller battery life: The revamped Oculus Touch controllers have the same buttons and analog sticks and triggers, like a split-apart PlayStation controller. But the new controllers are bigger and sturdier-feeling, and have a bigger button area with a thumb rest. The controllers still use AA batteries as opposed to being rechargeable, but last a lot longer on a single battery: Mine lasts on a pair of AA batteries for months. Also, the battery cover doesn’t randomly slide off like it sometimes does on the older Quest controllers.

    The game library: The Quest 2 is full of great VR game options. Many of these games can even look as good as their PC versions, although there may come a time in the next year or two when the hardware starts to feel its age.

    Oculus Quest 2 straps

    What’s a bit of a letdown

    It’s not as friendly to my larger glasses: The eye area on the new Quest is a bit smaller, and the included foam padding feels firmer and cushier. But my glasses now seem a bit more jammed in than on the older Quest. Meta sells a fit pack ($50) with a few different snap-out foam frames for different face types, so maybe I need one of those.

    It takes a long time to recharge:The headset lasts two to three hours, which is like the last Quest. I find battery life can run down in just one evening, and then I need to recharge. And recharging takes a long time — an hour or more, which means you’ll need to take a VR break whether you like it or not. Meta does sell an Elite Strap with an extra battery pack, plus a helpful case, which helped my longer-term play sessions a lot.

    Oculus Quest 2 USB cable

    The included USB-C cable is a lot shorter now: The original Quest included a super long USB-C cable that could be used to charge while playing, or tether via USB-C to a PC. The shorter charge cable with the Quest 2 makes that impossible, but guess what? Meta sells a longer cable for $80 (or you could buy your own for PC tethering via Oculus Link).

    No expandable storage: The 128GB on the $400 Quest will hold enough games and apps for most people (a few dozen, roughly). Still, no expandable storage means that you need to choose carefully. Hardcore VR users should consider the 256GB option.

    The LCD display’s blacks aren’t as black as the original Quest OLED: The fast-switch LCD on the Quest 2 is generally better, but the black levels are clearly less black. In a darkened virtual movie theater or with a dark game like The Room VR, I’m a lot more aware of the display’s light. (On the upside, bright images and text like web pages seem more vivid.)

    Oculus Quest 2 IPD adjustment switch

    IPD adjustment for my eyes was a bit of a learning process:The older Quest fit my eyes perfectly, and also had an interpupillary distance slider to fit eye distances for nearly anyone. The Quest 2 replaces the slider with three preset eye distance settings (53, 63 and 68mm) that are meant to fit most people, but at first my vision didn’t feel 100% with any of them. Over time, I readjusted the straps to my head and started to get better results. I also have thick prescription glasses, FYI.

    You can’t really use it in sunlight: The Oculus Quest 2 is like a vampire — keep it indoors. Direct sunlight can cause permanent damage to the displays if beams go through the inner lenses, and when I played outside, the headset tracking had some trouble finding the controllers. It’s a reminder that VR headsets still aren’t everyday take-absolutely-anywhere things quite yet, though I’ve done some outdoorsy experiments from time to time.

    A possible magic doorway to more, but what happens next with Meta?

    Meta’s road to the future is set toward augmented-reality smart glasses that can blend the virtual and real, but that could still be years off. In the meantime, the Quest 2 could have enough onboard power to evolve new ideas for the company’s immersive work. Its pro-level headset, Project Cambria, should introduce better controllers, more mixed reality, eye and face tracking, and a better display. It could be another bridge to where Meta’s AR ambitions lie, but at a much higher price. The Quest 2, meanwhile, could hang on as a more “budget” device for everyone else.

    Besides whatever concerns about Facebook and data you may have, there’s also the question of how open Meta will allow its VR universe to be. While the Quest connects easily with PCs, what about the future of phones? How will the Quest dovetail with the apps we use every day? Right now, it doesn’t. Mark Zuckerberg keeps pledging that the Quest’s future will be open. But the future ahead will be about phones and tablets that plug into VR and AR, and the Quest needs to find a way to be part of that future, too.

    For now, the Quest 2 remains a memorable VR and experiential headset, and the best self-contained device VR has ever had. The only question is how much better it can get.

    First published Sept. 16, 2020.

  • I Could’ve Used Qualcomm’s ChatGPT-Like Phone AI on My Trip to Hawaii

    I Could’ve Used Qualcomm’s ChatGPT-Like Phone AI on My Trip to Hawaii

    At Qualcomm’s Snapdragon Summit in Hawaii, the company revealed its next set of chips including the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, which will power next year’s top Android phones, likely including the Samsung Galaxy S24 series. In addition to expected improvements in performance and battery efficiency, the new silicon brings on-device generative AI to phones. At the summit, I saw Qualcomm give demos highlighting situations in which the feature could help users out. But it was during a day trip Hawaii adventure that I thought up specific ways that smartphone generative AI could be truly helpful.

    Following the summit, I remained on Maui to, ahem, do more research. Other summit-goers suggested a staple adventure of the island: the famed Road to Hana. From the Kahului Airport at the north of the island, it’s a bit more than a two-hour drive to Hana on the northeast side of Maui, but only if you don’t stop at the dozens of rest points, attractions, swimming pools, waterfalls, state and national parks, eateries and scenic views of the Hawaiian coast.

    The Road to Hana is as famous for its beauty as it is infamous for its challenges. The road rises hundreds of feet above the waterline and drops back down several times over the course of the 620 hairpin turns that block views of oncoming traffic. The road is barely wide enough to fit two cars abreast, except when it narrows to a single lane over 59 old concrete bridges that only fit one car at a time, forcing drivers to negotiate crossings with cars on the other side.

    And for most of the drive, there is zero cellphone service.

    As I encountered obstacles and made discoveries about the road, I couldn’t help but ponder what on-device AI could’ve helped with. In some ways, it might have told me exactly what I needed to know before I did it. But there are still things our current vacation survival guides and simple word-of-mouth do better to help us than any AI.

    A man in sunglasses stands in front of Maui grassland.

    Making plans for a last-minute day trip while abroad

    Let’s start from the beginning. After waking up Saturday morning from a post-summit sleep, I made the call at 8:30 a.m. to commit the whole day to the Road to Hana. I did as much research as I could, reading official guidebook sites and TripAdvisor forums and watching YouTube videos for a rundown of the day. I had a baseline of knowledge to make a timeline, plus advice from previous travelers about must-see experiences.

    I needed to make a limited agenda since I set out in my rental car at 10 a.m. Hana Highway veterans suggest leaving at daybreak to get the most out of the experience. I guessed which attractions would suit me and hoped for the best as I drove up from Maui’s southwest coast.

    Here’s how I think on-device AI could’ve helped: Several of Qualcomm’s demonstrations at the summit showed people asking a Snapdragon-powered generative AI to make a travel plan. Rather than spend an hour researching, I could’ve had the AI give me a plan in seconds, and refined it with follow-up questions. Or better yet, I could’ve jumped in the car earlier and had the AI make plans for me on the go.

    It’s not just that the on-device AI could make planning faster. Qualcomm says that the virtue of on-device AI is that it can consider more of your personal data since it’s being processed on the device and not going up to the cloud. The AI can draw conclusions about what people like from their behavior patterns, locations visited and photos. My device-generated itinerary could’ve recommended more beaches among the other attractions, which is what I ended up doing anyway only after guessing what things would’ve been less appealing for me.

    A line of trees on either side of the Hana Highway.

    Getting directions when signal was out

    As online forums and videos suggested I do, I bought an app audio guide (the Gypsy Guide specifically for Road to Hana) that voiced suggestions and area lore, which was brilliantly triggered when I passed specific GPS coordinates, effectively timing the advice ahead of upcoming attractions so I could choose if I wanted to see them.

    This audio guide was invaluable in helping me decide whether I should pull over or keep driving, especially as a solo explorer. But here’s the rub: Even if I had other people in the car with me to research while I drove, that wouldn’t be helpful once their phone signal cut out, which was the case for much of the Hana Highway.

    On-device AI could supplement the audio guide in other ways while on the drive. If I veered away from the guide’s path, I could ask the on-device AI for navigation help to find my way back to the main road. If there’s a map downloaded to the phone, the on-device AI could give me step by step directions contextually dependent on where I’d driven off to. As it was, I got too worried about leaving the main road to venture out.

    A man takes a selfie at an angle of him on the famous Wai'anapanapa Park's black sand beach.

    Filling in photo edges? Only if my photo is crooked

    Here’s another fun challenge about exploring alone: You’re taking all your own selfies, especially if kind strangers aren’t around to help. Even with friends, there are situations like in low light where I’d want to use the more powerful rear cameras to take better photos of us. I’ve developed a curious workaround of setting my camera to ultra-wide and flipping the phone around to blindly shoot selfies. If I want to make more of an effort, I use the Apple Watch’s camera app to try to preview the image, requiring extensive angling of phone and watch. It works about as well as you’d think.

    Qualcomm showed off another Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 on-device trick at the summit: using generative AI to expand the borders of a photo and predictively fill in what wasn’t originally captured. In practice, this could mean a photo taken with the main camera is made to look like it had been taken with an ultra-wide lens instead.

    But I found another potential use: fixing those janky photos you take accidentally. If I mistakenly took a photo at a Dutch angle, most phones’ existing editing tools will let you tilt it back to being level with the horizon — but that might end up shaving off too much of the sides. Generative AI could fill in the photo’s sides while keeping most of the original subject in the center of the shot.

    A plate of chicken on a table overlooking Koki Beach. The chicken looks spectacular, grilled to smoky yet moist perfection. It comes with a signature spicy vinegar sauce that's to die for. Sticky rice and a salad with miso dressing is behind it. And oh yeah, there's a pretty beach behind the chicken or whatever.

    There’s also the neat trick Qualcomm showed off on stage for removing unwanted subjects out of videos. Like Google’s Magic Eraser or Magic Editor that deletes people or things out of photos, a Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 phone could do the same fix for video, which would be nice given all the other people I inadvertently captured while shooting my litany of “I’d come back to this beach” videos.

    A man in sunglasses takes a selfie with a Maui beach behind him.

    Telling me if I had time to stay out or turn back

    I triumphantly passed through Hana and technically finished the road, but my audio guide said there were still a few must-see areas beyond. As the sun started dipping behind Haleakalā, I got nervous about the hairpin turns and bridges that I didn’t want to navigate in the dark. I stopped at a crossroads with the famous Wailua Falls ahead of me — and out of an abundance of caution, I turned back up the road to reverse my journey.

    I could’ve pushed on, and I regretted not feeling confident enough to see the vaunted pools below the waterfalls. Still out of signal range (I occasionally got a single bar of LTE), I would love to have asked a specific question: Do I have time for a quick visit and to get past the worst of the turns and one-lane bridges before nightfall?

    Those are the kind of “I wish I had an expert sitting next to me” questions I’d have loved to get answered on the spot. The audio guide cleverly checked in with seasoned advice depending on how far people got, so I had some sense of whether I should return, but nothing smart enough to consider timing the sunset for the current date or forecasting road conditions like whether traffic would slow me down enough before it got dark. Or, with personalization, taking into consideration how long my “quick stops” usually ended up being.

    With up-to-the-minute travel info, on-device AI could take into consideration my grumbling stomach and laid out a few options for dinner, given my timetable. In a place like Maui where shops don’t always keep regular or expected hours (alas for missing Sam Sato’s that closed at 2 p.m.), it would be nice to have an inkling of dinner options on the drive back.

    A man stands on an overlook with a stone railing between him and the foliage underneath, and then a far drop to the water below.

    Keeping me company on the long road

    Much hay has been made about generative AI’s capability to instantly write short stories or create images based on prompts, and unskilled people have rejoiced in the possibility of using ChatGPT or Midjourney to get rich quick with regurgitated material. But there’s potential in storytelling that isn’t used to feed capitalism’s yawning maw for content, and instead to help bored travelers pass the time.

    The audio guide came in extremely useful here, especially on the return journey as it thoroughly summarized the history of mankind’s millennia coming to and living on the Hawaiian islands. But what it couldn’t do was answer any follow-up questions I had. For instance, when Sanford Dole led business leaders in a coup dethroning the last monarch of Hawaii, Queen Lili’oukalani, leading to the annexation of the islands by the US and disenfranchisement of the Hawaiian people in favor of business moguls, I could’ve asked for more clarification on the impact of America’s colonization of the islands.

    There are other neat ways generative AI could help other folks in the car, like backseat gremlins getting restless who may calm down if a generative AI tells them stories. If some promising AI models are to be believed, we could even see AI-generated video soon, which would certainly help placate folks until a return to mobile signal range to stream their trusted favorites.

    And then there’s the stalwart driver, stoically handling every harrowing turn, who might welcome some conversation, however auto-generated. If I hadn’t had the foresight to download a couple podcasts to my phone, I would’ve had silence between the audio guide’s travel tips and history lessons. Heck, even though I fully downloaded those podcasts, Apple’s perpetually horrendous Podcasts app sometimes demanded internet connectivity to play them.

    In summary, I survived my solo adventure thanks to quick planning, and making tough calls on the road to forgo what could have been incredible sights and envy-inspiring Instagram photos. But offloading a lot of that cognition or even having a voice to help me sort my thoughts could make travel a lot easier. Take this all with a grain of salt, of course, as we’ve yet to personally test Qualcomm’s generative AI in a real product. (The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 launched in its first phone, the Xiaomi 14, during the summit, but we’ll have to wait until next year to see most of the handsets that will pack the chip.)

    Still, the possibilities remain. Who knows how having a bonus brain in your pocket will remove some of the friction of travel and make the views that much easier to enjoy.

    Editors’ note: CNET is using an AI engine to help create some stories. For more, see this post.

  • This Huge Samsung QLED TV Has Been Knocked Down to Its Lowest Price Ever

    This Huge Samsung QLED TV Has Been Knocked Down to Its Lowest Price Ever

    When it comes to a great home theater experience, there’s nothing that beats a large-screen TV with some great specs behind it. For example, this Q80C TV from Samsung is not only 85 inches, it also runs a QLED panel, which is better than a traditional LED panel on its own. Even better, the whole thing has a significant discount, bringing its price down to $1,998 from $3,298, a significant $1,300 off.

    One thing that’s pretty great about the Q80C is that it has its own internal upscaling chip, which can bring your older content up to a 4K standard. While it’s certainly not perfect and will vary depending on the quality of the source, it’s nice to have the option to upscale content, especially with a TV so big that you’ll start to notice lower resolutions. It also has Quantum HDR Plus, similar to HDR 10 Plus and will give you some excellent color reproduction and clarity.

    Another interesting aspect of the TV is that it runs at a base 120Hz refresh rate, which makes it perfect for watching high-intensity television like sports or action movies. It’s also great for gaming, so if you play on the PlayStation 5 or the Xbox Series X, you’ll get a lot out of this TV. If not, The Q80C supports Samsung’s Gaming Hub, which allows you to stream game content, assuming that you have a good enough connection and the right subscriptions.

    Overall, the Q80C is an excellent TV for an 85-inch screen at budget prices. While it might not have an OLED panel, it’s packed with enough features that it’s well worth grabbing one if you like the deal. Otherwise, check out some of these other great TV deals.

  • How Apple Used an iPhone 15 Pro Max to Film Its ‘Scary Fast’ Event Video

    How Apple Used an iPhone 15 Pro Max to Film Its ‘Scary Fast’ Event Video

    During its Scary Fast event Monday, Apple launched the new M3 chip series for its Macs alongside new MacBook Pros and iMacs. But it was the end of the presentation that caught my attention when a title card appeared that stated: “This event was shot on iPhone and edited on Mac.”

    The fineprint under the text said that all the presenters, locations and even drone footage were recorded with an iPhone 15 Pro Max. Apple has used slickly shot and edited prerecorded videos in lieu of in-person live presenters for product launch events since 2020. But this is the first time Apple ever broadcast a keynote event video that was filmed entirely with an iPhone.

    Yes, the same phone you use to record your kids playing around the house, or concerts or your pets being cute was used to record Apple CEO Tim Cook and other executives launching updated Macs. But this wasn’t the case of an eager Apple employee holding their new iPhone 15 Pro Max in landscape orientation, recording video and helping Cook find his best light.

    The $1,199 phone was mounted on pricey accessories like a camera crane, drone, gimbal and dolly, all while feeding video previews to multitudes of monitors. The iPhone 15 Pro Max was in a BeastGrip cage, which, depending on the specific model, costs anywhere from $140 to $325. There were external hard drives connected to the iPhone to save recordings, external mics used to record the audio, professional lighting and modifiers to make everyone from Cook to Issa Rae look their best.

    The video shoot and post-production involved a small army of professionals. Meaning that everything else, aside from the iPhone, still costs tens of thousands of dollars if not more.

    An iPhone 15 Pro Max recording Tim Cook

    Apple isn’t shy about promoting videos shot on an iPhone. Steven Soderbergh used an iPhone to shoot full-length films like Unsane and High Flying Bird. There’s no shortage of iPhone-shot music videos for singers like Lady Gaga and Olivia Rodrigo. Heck, Steven Speilberg shot his first music video (Marcus Mumford’s Cannibal) on an iPhone.

    In a press release that provides a behind-the-scenes look, Apple mentions that an iPhone 15 Pro Max with the free Blackmagic Camera app was used to record ProRes video in Apple Log, which allows a lot of leeway to color grade videos and minimize image noise in the shadows. Even with all the lighting, large stretches of Apple’s event video were filmed in darkness, with Cook standing outdoors under a night sky and wishing us all a “good evening” instead of his usual “good morning.”

    You can learn more about how Apple made the prerecorded event video here.

    I Took 600+ Photos With the iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max. Look at My Favorites

    See all photos

  • Microsoft 365 Copilot AI Tool Will Cost $30 Per Month, Launching Nov. 1

    Microsoft 365 Copilot AI Tool Will Cost $30 Per Month, Launching Nov. 1

    Microsoft has revealed its pricing for Microsoft 365 Copilot, launching Nov. 1, which integrates the large language model tech from OpenAI’s ChatGPT into Office applications, and it comes at a steep cost.

    While it’s still in early access, Microsoft said that 365 Copilot will cost $30 per user per month for E3, E5, Business Standard and Business Premium Customers when it becomes broadly available. In March, Microsoft brought its artificial intelligence-powered Bing into the Edge browser, calling it a “copilot” for the web.

    Bing Chat is also coming to Microsoft 365 enterprise users in preview form, Microsoft said Tuesday. One key selling point is the price: If you’re a Microsoft 365 E3, E5, Business Standard and Business Premium user, you’ll get Bing Chat Enterprise at no additional cost. In the future, it will be available as a stand-alone product for $5 per month.

    Microsoft is also pushing privacy as an important point, saying AI-powered chat data is protected and won’t leak outside an organization.

    “Chat data is not saved, and Microsoft has no eyes-on access — which means no one can view your data,” Microsoft said in a blog post. “And your data is not used to train the models.”

    Not to be outdone by Google, Microsoft is rolling out multimodal capabilities, bringing Visual Search to Bring Chat. This means you can use images in Bing Chat to search for things.

    With the launch of ChatGPT late last year, an AI chatbot that could answer almost any question with a unique response, there’s been a rush to use that tech across multiple applications. We’ve already seeing AI chatbots help people code, help with college applications and assist in dating apps. Heck, there’s even a ChatGPT-powered sex toy. But in business and enterprise applications, AI could become a powerful force. Already, Google is testing its Duet AI for Google Workspace, which brings the power of AI to Gmail and Docs to help people write.

    The enterprise AI market is expected to reach $88 billion by 2030, according to Verified Market Research. Given the rapid growth, it’s not at all surprising that companies are being bullish in the space.

    Bing Chat Enterprise isn’t Microsoft’s first flirtation with AI. The company was quick to up its investment in OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, earlier this year and integrate its tech into Bing.

    Editors’ note: CNET is using an AI engine to help create some stories. For more, see this post.

  • ‘The Curse’ Streaming Release Date and How to Watch From Anywhere

    ‘The Curse’ Streaming Release Date and How to Watch From Anywhere

    Bored with streaming? A new show from A24 and Showtime may be able to lift the curse.

    Starring Emma Stone and Nathan Fielder — known for the comedy series Nathan For You and The Rehearsal — The Curse is a 10-episode, genre-bending series that follows a couple trying for a baby while co-starring in a socially conscious reality show, Fliplanthropy. Unfortunately, paths of off-camera destruction accompany the on-camera renovations in the twisted series, per a Showtime synopsis.

    The Curse, which premiered at the New York Film Festival in October, also stars Benny Safdie, who co-created the show with Fielder. If you want to stream it, you’ll need to be a subscriber to Paramount Plus with Showtime. It’ll also debut linearly on Showtime. Here are the release dates, plus why using a VPN might make sense for you.

    When you can stream The Curse (Paramount Plus with Showtime subscribers)

    You’ll need a Paramount Plus with Showtime subscription to watch The Curse. In the US, the first episode premieres on Nov. 10 at 12:01 a.m. ET/Nov. 9 at 9:01 p.m. PT.

    If you want to catch it on Showtime, you’ll have to wait until it airs on Nov. 12 at 10 p.m. ET/PT.

    Paramount Plus with Showtime — not to be confused with Paramount Plus’ $6 per month ad-supported Essential plan — costs $12 per month and comes with perks including downloads, Showtime programming and your local live CBS station. While the Essential plan is ad-based, Paramount Plus with Showtime only displays ads on “live TV and a few shows.”

    How to watch The Curse with a VPN

    Perhaps you’re traveling abroad and want to stream Paramount Plus while away from home. With a VPN, you’re able to virtually change your location on your phone, tablet or laptop to get access to the series from anywhere in the world. There are other good reasons to use a VPN for streaming too.

    A VPN is the best way to stop your ISP from throttling your speeds by encrypting your traffic. Using a VPN is also a great idea if you’re traveling and find yourself connected to a Wi-Fi network and want to add an extra layer of privacy for your devices and logins. Streaming TV can be a bit smoother with a reliable, quality VPN that’s passed our tests and security standards.

    You can use a VPN to stream content legally as long as VPNs are allowed in your country and you have a valid subscription to the streaming service you’re using. The US and Canada are among the countries where VPNs are legal, but we advise against streaming or downloading content on illegal torrent sites. We recommend ExpressVPN, but you may opt for another provider from our best list, such as Surfshark or NordVPN.

    Follow the VPN provider’s instructions for installation, and choose a country where The Curse will be streaming on Paramount Plus. Before you open the streaming app, make sure you’re connected to your VPN using your selected region. If you want to stream The Curse on more than one device, it’s possible you’ll need to configure each one to ensure you’re signed in. Go to settings and check your network connections to verify you’re logged in and connected to your VPN account. Now you’re ready to open Paramount Plus to stream.

    If you run into issues with streaming, first make sure your VPN is up and running on its encrypted IP address. Double-check that you’ve followed installation instructions correctly and you’ve picked the right geographical area for viewing. If you still encounter connection problems, you may need to reboot your device. Close all apps and windows, restart your device and connect to your VPN first. Note that some streaming services have restrictions on VPN access.

  • This Pixel Buds Pro Deal With $80 Off Is Music to Our Ears

    This Pixel Buds Pro Deal With $80 Off Is Music to Our Ears

    Getting a great pair of wireless earbuds can be an expensive endeavor, but sometimes a deal crops up that saves the day. Right now, Amazon will sell you a pair of Google Pixel Buds Pro for just $119, a price that saves you $80 off the original $200 asking price.

    This deal doesn’t require that you enter any of those pesky discount codes and there are no on-screen coupons to deal with, either. Even better, Amazon is offering this special price on most of the Pixel Buds Pro’s various color options. The blue bay color isn’t part of this deal, however, so make sure that you see the correct price before adding anything to your cart. Note also that the price is being matched (or very close to it) at both Walmart and Best Buy, should you prefer to shop there.

    In terms of features, the Pixel Buds Pro have plenty to write home about. The spec list includes active noise cancellation, designed to ensure you don’t hear the outside world when you don’t want to. You’ll get up to 11 hours of battery life from a single charge as well, increasing to 31 hours when you take the included charging case into account.

    Like all good wireless earbuds, the Pixel Buds Pro can be used for making and taking calls, with the beamforming mics ensuring that everyone will hear you just fine even in windy environments. CNET’s David Carnoy particularly called that out in his Pixel Buds Pro review last year.

    It’s important to note that Amazon hasn’t yet said when this deal is going to end, which means that it might happen without any notice — make sure to get your order in now if you plan on taking advantage of that massive $80 saving.

  • You Can Grab Samsung’s Versatile M8 Smart Monitor for $300 Off

    You Can Grab Samsung’s Versatile M8 Smart Monitor for $300 Off

    It’s not often that you see something marketed as a smart monitor, but Samsung’s M8 is certainly that, with the hybrid ability to be both a monitor, TV and a standalone workplace for basic tasks. That makes the M8 great for those who don’t really need a PC or who’d like to have the option to use their monitor without having to switch a PC on. Even better, while the M8 usually goes for $700, you can grab it from Amazon for $400 if you clip the on-page coupon. That’s a chunky $300 discount and well worth it if you find the M8 intriguing.

    One of the big selling points of the Samsung M8 is the ability to work without a PC, and it does that by allowing you to do things like access Microsoft Office 365. You can also connect supported Samsung devices with Samsung DeX to stream your screen, and you can even connect remotely to a PC (although, at that point, you might as well link it with a cable). If you don’t want to do any work, you can switch it to TV mode, where you can access all the streaming apps you want, like Netflix and Amazon Prime.

    As a screen, it’s also pretty great; with a slim profile and a 32-inch size, it’s perfect for any desk space. It also runs at 4K and supports HDR10 Plus, although with a peak brightness of 400 nits, it’s not as good as HDR on a standalone TV. The only real downside is that you can’t adjust the height of the screen; you can only tilt it left, right, up and down. Its refresh rate is also just 60Hz, so if you’re gaming on a high-end PC, it might not be enough, although the consoles like the PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X should be able to use it just fine, since there aren’t a lot of console games that hit higher than 60Hz.

    The Samsung M8 is an interesting device because of its extreme versatility and somewhat niche concept. That said, it’s well worth grabbing for the massive discount if you think you could use it. Otherwise, if you’d like a more traditional monitor, check out these monitor deals for alternatives.

  • Best 43-Inch TV for 2023

    Best 43-Inch TV for 2023

    Updated on Sept. 8, 2023

    David_Katzmaier.jpg
    Written by David Katzmaier
    Our expert, award-winning staff selects the products we cover and rigorously researches and tests our top picks. If you buy through our links, we may get a commission.Reviews ethics statement
    David_Katzmaier.jpg
    David Katzmaier Editorial Director — Personal Tech
    David reviews TVs and leads the Personal Tech team at CNET, covering mobile, software, computing, streaming and home entertainment. We provide helpful, expert reviews, advice and videos on what gadget or service to buy and how to get the most out of it.
    Expertise A 20-year CNET veteran, David has been reviewing TVs since the days of CRT, rear-projection and plasma. Prior to CNET he worked at Sound & Vision magazine and eTown.com. He is known to two people on Twitter as the Cormac McCarthy of consumer electronics. Credentials

    • Although still awaiting his Oscar for Best Picture Reviewer, David does hold certifications from the Imaging Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Standards and Technology on display calibration and evaluation.
    CNET logoWhy You Can Trust CNET
    16171819202122232425+

    Product Tests

    14151617181920212223

    Testers

    6,0007,0008,0009,00010,00011,00012,00013,00014,00015,000

    Hours Tested

    CNET’s expert staff reviews and rates dozens of new products and services each month, building on more than a quarter century of expertise. How we test TVs

    Tiny spaces are all the rage right now. Anyone who’s lived in a dorm room or a 100-square-foot apartment in New York knows the struggles of decorating when you have limited space. But if you don’t have room for a vast 55-inch model, that doesn’t mean you have to settle for a bad TV. Shopping for TVs can be challenging, and the variety of choices for 43-inch TVs make it an overwhelming experience. There are plenty of great 43-inch TVs out there, and they’re definitely a better option than 32- or 40-inch models — you get more screen for just a little more money making it more than worth it.

    Going with a 43-inch screen will save you $100 or more compared to a 55-inch TV, and while I’d argue that if you have space it’s worth spending that bit extra, 43 inches is still big enough that you’ll have a good viewing experience. Also worth noting is that many 43-inch TVs do have excellent smart TV suites built in, so you don’t need to buy a separate streaming device to enjoy your favorite streaming services.

    Another downside to a 43-inch TV is that they typically don’t have the latest picture-enhancing extras such as full-array local dimming, 120Hz and advanced gaming features. As a result, finding a 43-inch TV set with a high-end, excellent picture is much more difficult than with 55-inch models. The exception is OLED TVs, which are available in 42-inch sizes (see below).

    The list below represents the best TVs in the 43-inch screen size I can recommend, with a couple of things to keep in mind going in:

    Best 43-inch TVs of 2023

    Show less
    $270 at Walmart

    Best budget 43-inch TV

    TCL 43S455

    The picture quality of the TCL 4-Series Roku TV was a step behind the Vizio V-Series in our budget TV test, but the differences between the two are slight enough that you’d really have to have them set up side by side to notice anything at all. The 4-Series lacks the Dolby Vision, Bluetooth connectivity and AMD FreeSync with a variable refresh rate, all of which the Vizio offers.

    The 4-Series’ advantage over the Vizio is that it comes with the excellent Roku Smart TV system built in. That makes it a great choice for those looking for a one-stop smart TV solution, without having to add an external streaming device.

    Note that TCL has been selling the 4-Series for the last few years with little to no change in image quality or features in our tests, although it has recently added some larger screen sizes, including an 85-inch option.

    Pros:

    • Affordable
    • Excellent smart TV system

    Cons:

    • Image quality and features lag some entry-level TVs

    Show expert take Show less

    Show less
    $250 at Best Buy

    Best budget 43-inch TV for picture quality

    Vizio V435M-K

    When we compared the best budget TVs side-by-side, the picture quality of Vizio’s V-Series clearly emerged as the leader of the pack. The Vizio offered the most balanced and accurate picture during our comparisons, and it comes with some useful extras such as Dolby Vision support, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth compatibility and variable refresh rate for potentially smoother gaming. The biggest downside of the Vizio is its smart TV platform, Vizio SmartCast. It’s crowded, slow and littered with ads for platforms such as Tubi and Kidoodle TV. Even when you factor in the cost of adding a new streaming device, however, the V-Series remains the best overall entry-level TV that we tested.

    Vizio hasn’t announced a 2023 version of the V-Series yet.

    Pros:

    • Solid image quality for an entry-level TV
    • Lots of features, including VRR and Wi-Fi 6E

    Cons:

    • Poor built-in smart TV system

    Show expert take Show less

    Show less
    $238 at Amazon

    Best budget 43-inch TV for design

    Hisense 43A6H

    The Hisense A6H Google TV, like the Vizio V-Series, offers some higher-end features at the entry-level price. This TV features a premium build quality and comes with Dolby Vision support, Bluetooth connectivity and DTS Virtual:X for simulated surround sound. The Hisense A6H comes preloaded with Google TV — which is our second favorite smart platform after Roku — but we found it ran slower than Google TV on higher-end TVs like the Sony X80K.

    Although its image quality falls short of the TCL and Vizio, the A6H also stands out from the pack in design. The bezels on the TV are incredibly thin, and the display itself attaches directly to the back of the panel, leaving corners that are round and metallic. This gives the TV a more premium finish that I did not see with other units in this price range.

    Ultimately, the Hisense A6H Google TV is a good choice for budget buyers who appreciate its design and want the Google TV interface.

    Pros:

    • Premium build quality
    • Dolby Vision support
    • Good smart TV platform

    Cons:

    • Picture quality isn’t quite as good as others on this list

    Show expert take Show less

    Show less
    $415 at Amazon

    Best step-up 43-inch TV

    Samsung QN43Q60B

    The Samsung Q60B is more expensive than the models above but it’s also better in pretty much every way. It’s got a slimmer, sleeker design, more features including a solar-powered remote and slightly better picture quality, with superior brightness, compared to the others. The TVs above are better values, but if you want something nicer in this size, and don’t want to break the bank on an OLED TV, the Q60B is a great choice.

    This is a 2022 model, but the 2023 version, the Q60C, looks largely similar in terms of features, design and price. We haven’t reviewed it yet, but we expect it to have similar image quality.

    Pros:

    • Sleek design and excellent remote
    • Bright image with solid contrast
    • Informative status screen for gaming

    Cons:

    • More expensive than competing TVs with better picture quality
    • Cluttered smart TV menus

    Show expert take Show less

    Show less
    $1,000 at Best Buy

    Best high-end 42-inch TV

    LG 42OLEDC2

    It’s technically an inch smaller than any of the other TVs on this list, but if you want the best TV in this size range and money isn’t a major concern, look no further than the LG C2. Its image quality and features run circles around any of the other TVs on this list — and the price is more than double. We’d recommend getting a larger version of the C2 (48-inch, 55-inch or more) if you could, but maybe your size is limited while your budget is not.

    The C1 was also an excellent TV that delivered similar image quality and features to the C2. We’ve also reviewed the 2023 version, the LG C3, but we recommend the C2 instead right now. Going with last year’s LG OLED saves you a few hundred bucks and the two TVs were basically indistinguishable in features, design and image quality in my tests. The C2 will sell out over the summer and heading into the TV buying season this fall, while the C3 will drop in price, but if you want a high-end TV right now, grab a C2.

    Pros:

    • Better picture quality than any non-OLED TV
    • Superior contrast and off-angle image
    • Best-in-class gaming features
    • Sleek styling with ultralight, thin panel

    Cons:

    • Expensive
    • No major picture quality improvements over the C1 from 2021

    Show expert take Show less

    Show less
    $270 at Amazon

    Best budget 43-inch TV for brightness

    Amazon Fire TV 4-Series

    The Fire TV 4 Series is one of the more basic TVs on this list. It doesn’t offer Dolby Vision or any perks for gamers, like AMD FreeSync. Instead, the Fire TV gives you a brighter image, an Alexa-powered voice remote and access to Amazon content.

    The Fire TV 4-Series offers the brightest screen and the best picture for gaming out of our entry-level models, but we liked its smart TV system least of all. That said, it could be a good fit for people with bright rooms or those who are tied into the Amazon ecosystem.

    Pros:

    • Excellent brightness
    • Alexa-powered voice remote

    Cons:

    • Underwhelming picture quality
    • Poor smart TV system
    • No premium extras like Dolby Vision or any gaming perks

    Show expert take Show less

    How CNET tests 43-inch TVs

    Our TV reviews follow a rigorous, unbiased evaluation process honed over nearly two decades of TV reviews. Our primary TV test lab has specialized equipment for measuring light and color, including a Konica Minolta CS-2000 spectroradiometer, a Murideo Sig-G 4K HDR signal generator and an AVPro Connect 8×8 4K HDR distribution matrix. We use Portrait Displays CalMan Ultimate software to evaluate every TV we review. In every CNET TV review, three or more similar TVs are compared side by side in various lighting conditions playing different media, including movies, TV shows and games, across a variety of test categories, from color to video processing to gaming to HDR. Our reviews also account for design, features, smart TV performance, HDMI input and gaming compatibility, and other factors.

    One important aspect of image quality we test is overall brightness. Here’s how it compares in nits across select TVs listed above.

    Testing light output in nits

    TV Brightest mode (HDR) Accurate mode (HDR) Brightest mode (SDR) Accurate mode (SDR)
    Samsung QN65Q90B 3,316 1,981 2,625 974
    Hisense U8H 1,867 1,867 1,605 1,605
    TCL 65R655 1,387 1,194 1,292 624
    Vizio M65QXM-K03 939 742 958 608
    LG OLED65C2 812 759 413 389
    Roku TV Plus (65-inch) 514 455 579 404

    Check out our page on how we test TVs for more details.

    How to choose a 43-inch TV

    With all of the TVs available today, and all of the technical terms and jargon associated with television technology, it can be tough to figure out what’s important. Here’s a quick guide to help cut through the confusion.

    Price: TVs range in price from $100 to more than $2,000. Smaller screens are cheaper, well-known brands are more expensive and spending more money can also get you better image quality. Most entry-level TVs have a good enough picture for most people, but TVs last a long time, so it might be worth spending more to get a better picture. It’s also best to shop for a TV in the fall, when prices are lower.

    Screen size: We know you’re looking for a 43-inch TV, but we have to say that bigger is better in our book. 43 inches is our minimum recommended size for a small bedroom. If you want a TV for a room that’s anything other than tiny, we advise going up to at least 55 inches — and 65 inches or larger is best. More than any other “feature,” stepping up in TV screen size is the best use of your money. One of the most common post-TV-purchase complaints we’ve heard is from people who didn’t go big enough. And we almost never hear people complain that their TV is too large.

    Capability: Among entry-level TVs the most important feature is what kind of smart TV system the TV uses. Among midrange models, look for a feature including full-array local dimming, mini-LED and 120Hz refresh rate, which (unlike some other extras) do help improve the picture in our experience. And among high-end TVs, OLED technology is your best bet.

    For more TV buying advice check out our guide on how to buy a TV.

    43-inch TV FAQs