Author: TechGeeks

  • Asus just priced its RTX 5080 gaming laptop higher than a last-gen RTX 5090 model

    Asus just priced its RTX 5080 gaming laptop higher than a last-gen RTX 5090 model

    Asus has quietly added an RTX 5080 option to the ROG Zephyrus G16 (2026) for buyers in the US, and it is priced at $4,799. 

    That’s odd because last year’s ROG Zephyrus G16 with a more powerful RTX 5090 is currently sitting on Amazon for $4,599. Somehow, Asus has priced a less powerful GPU at a higher price than its predecessor with a better GPU.

    So what exactly does $4,799 buy you?

    The new model pairs Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 5080 with Intel’s Core Ultra 9 386H (Panther Lake) processor, 64GB of RAM, and a boosted TGP of up to 160W, which is 20W more than the RTX 5070 Ti variant, which was the only US option until now. 

    The extra headroom matters, as the RTX 5080 is around 15% faster than the 5070 Ti. The gap could widen in VRAM-heavy titles, especially since the 5080 has 16GB of VRAM while the 5070 Ti maxes out at 12GB. 

    RAM doubles too, from 32GB to 64GB. It also comes in a new silver finish for those who’re interested.

    Does the upgrade actually justify the price jump?

    The new ROG Zephyrus G16 (2026) with the RTX 5080 costs $1,100 more than the one with the RTX 5070 Ti. If you do the math, that’s a 29% price increase, partly due to the more powerful GPU and partly due to double the memory capacity

    The specs, I’d say, are meaningfully better for heavy users. However, I can’t overlook the fact that the 2025 ROG Zephyrus G16, with an RTX 5090 and 64GB of RAM, no less, costs $200 less on Amazon right now.

    If raw GPU performance is your priority, the math doesn’t favor the new model, making the older one a no-brainer for most buyers. Keep in mind that it’s based on Intel’s Arrow Lake architecture.

  • Samsung verifies Exynos 2700 development, likely to power the upcoming Galaxy S27

    Samsung verifies Exynos 2700 development, likely to power the upcoming Galaxy S27

    Samsung has officially announced that work on the Exynos 2700 processor is under way, providing the first direct confirmation that the company’s next high‑end chip is in the pipeline.

    The firm typically equips its Galaxy S flagships with two separate silicon options – some regions receive Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon, while others get Samsung’s own Exynos. Recent years have seen a few deviations: the Galaxy S23 line in 2023 and the Galaxy S25 line in 2025 were launched solely with Snapdragon chips, sparking speculation that the Galaxy S27 might follow suit.

    That scenario now appears less likely. In a recent management briefing reported by Hankyung, Samsung System LSI President Park Yong‑In confirmed that the Exynos 2700 is currently being developed. He said the project is progressing smoothly and that the chip is being prepared for use in “top‑tier smartphones.” While Samsung did not name any specific models, the consensus is that the Galaxy S27 series will be the first to feature the new processor.

    Leaks point to major efficiency gains

    Rumors about the Exynos 2700 have been circulating since 2024. An early leak suggested a 12% performance uplift over the previous generation, while also targeting a 25% reduction in power draw and an 8% shrink in die size.

    Additional reports indicate the chip will be fabricated on Samsung Foundry’s second‑generation 2 nm process, known as SF2P, and that Samsung is developing new thermal‑management technologies to keep efficiency high under load.

    Early benchmark data offers clues

    In April, a Geekbench list believed to belong to an Exynos 2700 engineering sample surfaced online. The scores were roughly comparable to the current Exynos 2600, but the sample achieved them at clock speeds below 3 GHz. This suggests Samsung may be emphasizing efficiency rather than chasing raw benchmark numbers.

    There are also indications that Samsung could introduce a new Heat Path Block (HPB) design for the Exynos 2700, improving cooling. Qualcomm’s forthcoming flagship, likely the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 Pro, is expected to retain higher peak performance, but Samsung may prioritize longer battery life and steadier performance over extended usage periods.

  • Amazon pulls back from Sam Altman film ‘Artificial’ as it may have hit too close to home

    Amazon pulls back from Sam Altman film ‘Artificial’ as it may have hit too close to home

    Amazon MGM Studios just backed out of releasing Artificial, Luca Guadagnino’s movie about OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.

    According to Deadline, the studio confirmed it will no longer distribute the nearly finished film, even though it had been in the works for roughly a year and had already screened well in early test audiences.

    What Artificial is actually about, and why Amazon dropped it?

    Artificial is billed as a comedic drama covering the chaotic five days in 2023 when Altman was abruptly fired by OpenAI’s board. That apparently traced back to Altman trying to push out board member Helen Toner after she praised rival Anthropic Claude‘s safety practices over OpenAI’s own.

    Microsoft swooped in with a job offer almost instantly, and most of OpenAI’s staff threatened to quit in response. Four days later, Altman was back as CEO, with a big chunk of the board replaced. The movie cast includes Andrew Garfield stars as Altman, with Monica Barbaro playing former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati, Yura Borisov as chief scientist Ilya Sutskever, and Ike Barinholtz taking on Elon Musk.

    Amazon told Deadline it has enormous respect for Guadagnino (who made movies like the Challengers) and hopes to keep working with him, but believes Artificial would be better served by a different studio. Other reports also suggest that the movie leans darker than Amazon initially expected, with both Altman and Musk’s characters coming across as the least sympathetic figures on screen.

    Why the timing feels less than coincidental?

    Amazon and OpenAI share a deep financial relationship, with Amazon announcing a $50 billion investment in the AI company earlier this year, including AWS becoming OpenAI’s exclusive cloud partner.

    Altman and Amazon chairman Jeff Bezos also reportedly share a personal friendship, with Altman attending Bezos’s wedding last year. Whether either relationship influenced Amazon’s decision remains unconfirmed, but the optics are hard to ignore.

    Other studios are now being shown the film as talks continue about where it might land next. For now, Artificial is a movie without a home, caught in the middle of the very tech politics it was made to dramatize.

  • Google Health 5.02 restores Hourly Activity and Nap tracking

    Google Health 5.02 restores Hourly Activity and Nap tracking

    Since Google renamed the Fitbit app to Google Health, the platform has been evolving. The latest release, version 5.02, addresses several regressions, bringing back features that vanished during the redesign.

    The most noticeable returns are the Hourly Activity chart and the Nap tracker, both of which had quietly disappeared (as reported by 9to5Google).

    **What’s back in Google Health 5.02?**

    – **Hourly Activity** now shows a graph of your step count for each hour alongside your daily step target. You can re‑add this widget to the Today or Health tab via the customize menu or the pencil icon.

    – **Naps** are back for Android users. Recorded naps appear on dedicated tabs within the daily Sleep Score view, making day‑to‑day comparison easier. iPhone users will receive this functionality with version 5.03.

    – The **Restlessness bar** has been moved directly under the sleep‑stage graph for clearer reading, and the ability to delete or edit sleep sessions works correctly again.

    **Other fixes and enhancements**

    – The Today tab now includes an *Expanded view* that displays more metrics at a glance without the need to swipe. Reordering items on Today has also been streamlined.

    – Nutrition tracking receives three upgrades: faster food‑search results, estimated macronutrients shown before confirming a food entry, and an updated Nutrition tile that shows total calories consumed and remaining calories for the day.

    – Android users see serving sizes and calorie information directly in food‑search results, a feature that will roll out to iOS with version 5.03.

    – You can now delete individual exercise sessions, food logs, and weight entries synced from partner apps straight from Google Health.

    The update is already live for iOS, while Android users are receiving it gradually.

  • AI agents require more than reasoning—they must browse the web

    AI agents require more than reasoning—they must browse the web

    A firm launched an AI‑driven customer‑service assistant that, on paper, was modern and capable enough for the role. The bot went live, but within a week the volume of support tickets actually increased.

    The culprit wasn’t the model; it was the company’s own website. The return‑policy the assistant had to quote lived in a PDF, the shipping calculator was a multi‑step form, and the product specifications were hidden behind a tabbed interface that only loaded after a click. To a human visitor the site works perfectly, but to the AI half of the site effectively doesn’t exist.

    This is the obstacle most agentic AI deployments are confronting today, and it has little to do with the underlying model.

    McKinsey’s 2025 State of AI report shows that 23 % of organisations are already scaling agentic AI in at least one business function, with another 39 % experimenting. The majority of these projects will hit the same wall: a website built for humans being fed to software that needs capabilities humans never required. The next leap for AI agents isn’t sharper reasoning—it’s the capacity to truly navigate and utilise the live internet.

    The three tasks an AI agent must master on the web

    Search. The agent must locate the exact information, not just a list of URLs. For example, if a user asks an insurance chatbot whether a policy covers a specific event, the bot needs to surface the relevant clause, not a generic search‑results page.

    Scrape. After finding the page, the agent has to extract the content cleanly. Modern sites often load data via JavaScript, hide text inside accordions, tabs, or lazy‑loaded sections, so the raw HTML the agent receives can look nothing like what a human sees.

    Interact. This is where most demos crumble in production. Crucial information is frequently hidden behind “load more” buttons, search boxes, multi‑step forms, navigation menus, or login walls. A scraper that only reads static pages can’t reach it; an agent that can click, navigate, fill out forms and submit them can. Interaction is the newest and toughest capability, and it powers the most valuable use cases—price‑comparison shopping assistants, research tools that pull data from interactive dashboards, and support bots that traverse documentation portals just like a real user would.

    Firecrawl builds the underlying layer

    Firecrawl is one of the companies constructing infrastructure that supports all three functions. Its platform sits between AI agents and the live web, handling search, scraping and interaction as managed services behind a single API. The open‑source project has amassed over 120,000 stars on GitHub, and customers such as Lovable, Replit and Zapier run it in production. Nexus Venture Partners led a $14.5 million Series A round in 2025, with Shopify CEO Tobi Lütke joining as an investor after first using Firecrawl as a client.

    The value proposition is simple: an AI agent built on top of Firecrawl doesn’t need custom code for every site it touches. It calls an API, and the platform takes care of rendering JavaScript, navigating dynamic pages, interacting with elements, and returning structured output that the AI can consume.

    “Every AI company needed clean web data and nobody was solving it well,” says Eric Ciarla, co‑founder of Firecrawl. “So we built Firecrawl.”

    Ciarla and his co‑founders ran into the problem while building Mendable, an AI search platform. The search engine worked, but the pipeline that pulled data from each client’s website kept breaking whenever the site changed. Rebuilding fragile extraction code for every new integration was a constant headache—a situation many AI firms face when they try to ingest web data.

    AI is becoming the new discovery channel

    For two decades, the route from “a customer is looking for something” to “the customer finds your business” usually ran through traditional search engines. Today, AI assistants are increasingly the first stop for people seeking recommendations, comparisons or answers. The assistant goes out, gathers information from relevant sites on the user’s behalf, and returns a synthesized response. If the assistant can’t parse your site, your business disappears from its answer.

    Ciarla argues this flips the usual narrative around AI crawlers. Historically, they were seen as unwanted bots that consumed bandwidth without delivering human traffic. That made sense when only search engines were reading sites at scale. Now, when AI agents are the very path humans use to discover information, blocking them is akin to shutting off an emerging discovery channel.

    What sets Firecrawl apart is that it requires no action from the website owner. Most AI‑visibility solutions ask site owners to add markup, expose new endpoints, or restructure pages. Firecrawl works in the opposite direction, automatically converting human‑readable pages into machine‑readable data in real time, without the site owner ever needing to know an AI is looking.

    The ecosystem question

    As agents harvest more data from more sites, the relationship between AI systems and content creators becomes a pressing issue. A model that extracts value from web content without giving anything back to the publishers isn’t sustainable. Publishers are pushing back with lawsuits and access blocks, and major sites are increasingly walling off their content from AI crawlers.

    In March 2026, Firecrawl partnered with Wikimedia Enterprise to route its Wikipedia traffic—2‑3 million requests per month—through Wikimedia’s commercial APIs instead of scraping pages directly. The deal swaps heavy‑handed scraping for paid, structured access and helps support the volunteer community that maintains one of the web’s most‑cited information sources.

    “The community members who write and edit these articles hold immense power in the age of AI,” Ciarla said. “We want to ensure our infrastructure supports their work rather than just consuming it.”

    This partnership is one possible model; similar arrangements may appear as AI products move from demos to large‑scale production. The companies that build the underlying infrastructure will shape how AI interacts with the web.

    What this means for you

    If you’re building AI products, the takeaway is clear: the model is no longer the main differentiator. Frontier models are widely available and the gap between them is narrowing. What separates a production‑ready AI product from a flop is the underlying layer that can actually retrieve the needed information. Investing in that layer can yield significant engineering advantages.

    If you run a business and haven’t considered AI agents reading your website, now is the time to start. The discovery channel is shifting. A customer who once would have found you via a traditional search engine may now rely on an AI assistant. If that assistant can’t read your site, you risk being invisible.

  • Techgeeks: This massive ASUS gaming laptop costs roughly three new MacBook Pros

    Techgeeks: This massive ASUS gaming laptop costs roughly three new MacBook Pros

    Following up on the ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)‘s impressive act, ASUS has built a successor that looks even more ridiculous if you glance at the spec sheet. The ROG Strix Scar 18 (2026) is not a cute little café laptop. The flagship gaming machine is built around a large 18‑inch 4K miniLED display and hardware that embarrasses most desktop PCs.

    But all of this comes at a cost, and you might want to sit down for this one.

    Why the ROG Strix Scar 18 is overkill

    The SCAR 18 is powered by up to an Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus processor and up to an Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop GPU. The GPU can run at up to 175 W, while the laptop can hit up to 320 W of total system power in Manual mode. This is literally hitting entry‑level gaming PC levels of power draw.

    Keeping the beefy specs cool is an end‑to‑end vapor chamber, a sandwiched heatsink, rear exhaust vents, and a tri‑fan cooling setup that pulls air through the keyboard deck.

    It is expensive, obviously

    Even the pricing is just as mind‑boggling, with the starting variant arriving for $4,299. This is the RTX 5080 GPU variant with 32 GB of RAM and 1 TB of SSD storage. In the UK, the RTX 5090 model costs a whopping £5,299, with 64 GB of memory and a 2 TB SSD.

    For context, you can probably buy like seven base MacBook Neos or about three MacBook Pros. Yes, this laptop serves a different purpose, but that comparison shows just how absurd the prices are.

    Your portable desktop replacement

    There are plenty of practical enthusiast touches here. It supports up to 128 GB of DDR5‑6400 RAM and up to 8 TB of PCIe Gen 5 storage, with a tool‑less bottom panel for easier upgrades. You’re not limited to just gaming since the performance would support a wide range of workflows, including high‑end creative projects.

    ASUS built the ROG Strix Scar 18 for someone who wants a giant display and uncompromising performance in a portable form factor, not just gamers.

  • AI tools that help students cheat are multiplying, and the detectors can’t keep up

    AI tools that help students cheat are multiplying, and the detectors can’t keep up

    A wave of new apps marketed on TikTok and YouTube is making it nearly impossible for teachers to tell whether students are actually writing their own homework or offloading it to AI. The New York Times reports that tools known as humanizers and autotypers have closed the gap that used to give AI-written homework away, and that the same companies selling detection software are sometimes the ones helping students get around it.

    The tools work around the checks teachers rely on

    Humanizers take AI-generated text and rework it so it no longer sounds robotic or repetitive enough to trigger detection, while autotypers solve a timing problem. Instead of a thousand words appearing in a document all at once, which can tip off a teacher checking version history, autotypers release the text gradually over hours and even insert fake typos, deletions, and edits to mimic a real writing session.

    Apps like Dripwriter and Duey.ai advertise this directly, telling students they can step away entirely and still turn in something that looks self-written. One app, called Typeflo, promised students could relax and eat a sandwich while it produced their essay. It turned out to be built and marketed by the teenage son of an Emory University professor, who said he hadn’t known the extent of its social media presence and pulled it down after being contacted.

    Even the detectors built to catch AI can’t be trusted

    GPTZero‘s entire pitch rests on detecting AI writing that other tools miss, but the Times found that a marketer paid by the company had built a fake graduate teaching assistant persona on TikTok to promote it to students. The videos walked students through GPTZero’s browser extension, showing them how to screen a paper for AI flags before submitting it and revealing that the same tool could generate a full paper with citations from scratch.

    Responding to the report, GPTZero’s co-founder and chief executive, Edward Tian, said the company has cut ties with the marketer and is reconsidering whether to keep that paper-generating capability. Grammarly faces a similar contradiction, offering an authorship checker for teachers while also providing a humanizer, text generation, and paraphrasing tools on the same platform. That unreliability isn’t limited to these two companies either.

    A report from earlier this year revealed how University of Florida researchers tested the five most popular AI text detectors and found false negative rates as high as 99.6 percent, with a single vocabulary tweak defeating most of them entirely. The findings suggest that schools leaning on these tools for disciplinary decisions are working with far less certainty than they assume.

    Outlawing AI in classrooms might sound like the obvious fix, but with detection this unreliable, schools may have no way to enforce it even if they tried. Some educators argue that’s beside the point anyway, since students will need these same tools the moment they enter the workforce.

  • Gemini Live now retains information from earlier chats

    Gemini Live now retains information from earlier chats

    Talking to Gemini Live no longer means starting from a blank slate every time. Google has quietly extended memory access to Gemini‘s conversational mode, allowing it to recall details from past conversations when answering new questions.

    What the update brings

    9to5Google spotted the change on a Google support page, which describes Gemini Live gaining access to memory of past chats, plus information from select Connected Apps. With this change, Gemini Live can now hold onto specifics shared in earlier sessions, like dietary restrictions or important family dates, so users no longer have to repeat themselves.

    The feature is rolling out in English in the US for now, with no word from Google about a wider release or support for more languages.

    Closing the gap with text‑based Gemini

    Memory has been part of Gemini’s standard chat experience for over a year, but Live operated without it until now, creating an odd split depending on whether someone typed or spoke to the assistant. The latest update closes that gap, but one inconsistency remains.

    9to5Google notes that the Personal Intelligence settings page on Android still lists momory as “coming soon” for Live, despite the feature already functioning for some users. This points to a staggered rollout, so you may not see the feature on your end just yet.

    Memory is the kind of feature people only notice when it’s missing. Gemini Live had gone without it well after rivals like ChatGPT’s voice mode picked it up, and closing that gap does more for everyday usefulness than flashier additions tend to. If this update follows the same pattern as memory’s debut in standard Gemini, broader language support and wider availability should follow in the coming months.

  • Free Flashback app lets you give photos the classic Game Boy Camera vibe without any cartridge

    Free Flashback app lets you give photos the classic Game Boy Camera vibe without any cartridge

    The chunky, low‑resolution images that once only appeared on a Game Boy screen can now be captured directly with your phone. A new camera app named Flashback can mimic the Game Boy Camera’s distinctive aesthetic without needing the original hardware, reports The Verge.

    Built around the GB Operator

    Flashback is a product of Epilogue, the makers of the GB Operator – a $50 peripheral that enables modern devices to run legacy Game Boy, Game Boy Color, and Game Boy Advance cartridges. The app primarily targets owners of a genuine Game Boy Camera cartridge, allowing them to hook it up to a smartphone via the GB Operator and snap pictures straight from the camera’s native sensor.

    Flashback adds several features the 1998 device never had, such as manual exposure and grain controls, plus dozens of colour‑filter presets that can be applied after shooting.

    A bonus mode for everyone else

    For users without the original cartridge or the GB Operator, Flashback offers a simulation mode. It reproduces the hardware’s look by downscaling photos taken with a phone’s camera to a tiny resolution, stripping most colour and overlaying a rough, dithered texture to emulate the classic appearance. The processed image is saved directly to the camera roll, ready for sharing – a convenience the original gadget never provided.

    The simulation mode gives anyone curious about the format a chance to try the look without tracking down a 25‑year‑old cartridge or purchasing Epilogue’s $50 accessory. The app is free to download and works on both Android and iOS.

  • BMW launches i3 orders early, thanks to overwhelming demand

    BMW launches i3 orders early, thanks to overwhelming demand

    BMW had originally scheduled the opening of order books for the upcoming i3 sedan for this autumn, but the automaker has moved the date up to this week. The catalyst is the kind of “happy problem” every car maker dreams of – far more customers want the vehicle than anticipated, and BMW decided it would be impolite to keep them waiting.

    When will the i3 be available in the United States?

    According to Germany’s Automobilwoche, BMW is already accepting reservations for a “1st Edition” i3 in Germany, well ahead of the planned timeline. At present, only the i3 50 xDrive is on offer.

    The early launch does not affect the production schedule; assembly in Munich is still set to commence in August. For U.S. buyers, the wait will be longer, with the i3 slated to arrive in 2027 and pricing yet to be disclosed.

    When it finally reaches the U.S., the model will feature a NACS charging port, enabling native use of Tesla Superchargers, and will include a CCS adapter for other charging networks.

    What does the BMW i3 bring to the table?

    Pre‑release EPA estimates give the i3 a range of roughly 440 miles, surpassing the range of any current Tesla model sold in the U.S. Power is delivered by two electric motors producing 469 hp and 476 lb‑ft of torque.

    The motors draw energy from an approximately 107 kWh battery capable of charging at up to 400 kW. This rapid charge rate means a jump from 10 % to 80 % takes only about 22 minutes despite the large battery.

    Every i3 will also feature Vehicle‑to‑Load capability, allowing up to 3.7 kW to be drawn from the battery to run tools, appliances, or other electronics. A rear‑wheel‑drive variant with a smaller battery pack is expected in the future, though BMW has not confirmed a timeline.